CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

3 861 résultats pour « Stuart White »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161838

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2016

10 mars 2016

On 7 October 2008 the President of the Arbitration Tribunal informed the applicant company that its request to start arbitral proceedings would not be granted.

Source officielle

Page 18 sur 194

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1012DEC004344098

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2000

12 octobre 2000

Moreover, in this respect the contracting States enjoy a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a difference in treatment

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216448

Admin. suprême

25 février 2022

25 février 2022

Arial; text-transform:uppercase } Published on 14 March 2022   SECOND SECTION Application no. 31338/21 Cristina BRACCI against San Marino lodged on 4 June 2021 communicated on 25 February 2022 STATEMENT

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0622JUD002594619

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2023

22 juin 2023

  25946/19, the Court notes that the applicant died on 20 May 2020 while the case was pending before the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006JUD004971518

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2022

6 octobre 2022

  49715/18 died on 16 January 2019, while the case was pending before the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1206JUD001110909

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2018

6 décembre 2018

  11109/09, the Court notes that the applicant died on 29 November 2011, while the case was pending before the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116855

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2013

30 janvier 2013

the applicant should have been properly legally represented or assisted in the first-instance proceedings, and that the court had wrongly admitted the applicant’s former husband as a representative while

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1380508-1441446

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2005

22 juin 2005

Denmark – On 3 June 1999 Mr Sørensen, who was a student about to start at university, began working as a holiday relief worker for the company FDB ( FDB distributionen ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0213DEC002443111

Admin. suprême

13 février 2020

13 février 2020

While the impugned custody proceedings were ongoing, several sets of enforcement proceedings, as well as criminal proceedings, were initiated against the applicant in connection with his refusal to comply

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-210114

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2021

21 avril 2021

of limitations had already expired prior to the submission of the written statement of the grounds for the cassation appeal, but where that statement did not contain a complaint about the failure of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0616DEC001880510

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2016

16 juin 2016

  18805/10 were awarded EUR 5,000 as reparation and the applicant in application no. 17305/11 was awarded EUR 7,000 as reparation; all the amounts being comparable to what would have been awarded

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC002772918

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2022

6 octobre 2022

The Court notes that, as pointed out by the Government, the envelope containing the completed application form in the present case was postmarked as 29   May 2018, while the applicant indicated “23

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0502JUD002613295

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2000

2 mai 2000

These are the statements of three different women interviewed by Bergens Tidende .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115816

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2012

14 décembre 2012

outside the United States.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0411DEC006990801

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2006

11 avril 2006

as a result of the violence to which he had been subjected while in police custody.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1005JUD002205908

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2017

5 octobre 2017

A witness statement record ( liecinieka nopratināšanas protokols ) was drawn up.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1110JUD006567911

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2016

10 novembre 2016

The applicant did not appeal against that decision and apparently prepared to start the construction works. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326JUD001923418

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2026

26 mars 2026

While the relevant entry in the Unified State Register of Pre-trial Investigations referred to a   murder charge, it also contained a note on the possibility that his death had been a suicide. 12

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142767

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2014

1 avril 2014

She also indicated that on 15 March 2013 she was supposed to start treatment with “A” at the Oncology Section of the Turnu Măgurele Hospital. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0507DEC002354920

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2026

7 mai 2026

In the present case, the applicants’ allegations of their continued detention had no basis in any supporting documents or evidence, apart from their bare statements.

Source officielle