CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

438 résultats pour « Steven Calot »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0131DEC004647910

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2017

31 janvier 2017

  328 ‑ C; see also Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy , nos.

Page 18 sur 22

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0218JUD000198806

Admin. suprême

18 février 2020

18 février 2020

    That the shareholders mentioned in points 3 and 4 above [the applicants] shall privately own the land on which the buildings on Stefan cel Mare Boulevard 136 attributed to them after the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002476094

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 1998

28 octobre 1998

Mr   Anton Assenov was born in 1978, and his parents, Mrs   Fidanka Ivanova and Mr   Stefan Ivanov, were born in 1956 and 1952 respectively. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0701REP001724090

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1992

1 juillet 1992

  On 19 April 1977 the first applicant appealed against this refusal to the Provincial Executive (Gedeputeerde Staten) of the Province of North Holland.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0614JUD002804008

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2011

14 juin 2011

    The applicants were represented by Dr Stefan Frendo, a lawyer practising in Valletta.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0111DEC001729890

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 1993

11 janvier 1993

  The applicant's heirs cannot claim the costs of the Regional Court or Court of Appeal proceedings; solely the costs of the Federal Court proceedings may be considered.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1129DEC002113205

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2007

29 novembre 2007

On 12 August 2003 the first applicant notified the State Media Administration ( Statens medieforvaltning ) of its intention to broadcast the political advertisements and argued that such broadcasting was

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0607REP001557689

Admin. suprême

7 juin 1990

7 juin 1990

  Cruz was at that point dazed from the previous treatment and cannot therefore say with certainty if there was more than one person.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0515DEC004945806

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2012

15 mai 2012

The Court cannot ignore either the similarity between the present applicant’s complaints under Article 8 of the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol No. 4, dismissed by the Administrative Jurisdiction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1005JUD003796718

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2023

5 octobre 2023

The applicant’s complaints cannot therefore be dismissed on the ground that he did not institute civil proceedings for damages against the State.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0711JUD005124911

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2017

11 juillet 2017

11) against the Republic of Croatia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Croatian national, Mr Stevan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1104JUD006189119

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2025

4 novembre 2025

Hungary , no. 66232/10, §   42, 27 January 2015), it cannot be overlooked that the amount of the penalty exceeds the applicant’s declared income for a period of two months (see paragraph 25 above)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1030JUD001755605

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 2007

30 octobre 2007

    The applicants, Mr Srbislav Marčić (the “first applicant”), Mr Stevan Kostić (the “second applicant”), Mr Slavko Pešić (the “third applicant”), Mr Radoslav Pesić (the “fourth applicant”),

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1130DEC001669790

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 1992

30 novembre 1992

Um U.P. ziehen sich die Fäden nicht nur in Oesterreich       enger, sondern auch die Beweise in der Schweiz werden immer       drückender, denn nun stehen

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0304DEC001904891

Admin. suprême

4 mars 1996

4 mars 1996

xa0;          Übergang von Vermögenswerten nach Artikel 89, 90, 134 und            135 im Zusammenhang stehen

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0416JUD007209814

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2019

16 avril 2019

    The applicant was represented by Mr Stefán Geir Þórisson, a lawyer practising in Reykjavik.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD006273609

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2013

27 juin 2013

(“the Convention”) by two Greek nationals, Mr Sokratis Vassis and Mr Dimitrio Bardoulis, four Sierra Leonean nationals, Mr Alusine Kamara, Mr Harry Michael Taylor, Mr Samuel Silvanus Thomas and Mr Steven

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC005474913

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2014

27 mai 2014

That being so, the case cannot be examined by the Court . You are therefore requested to supplement the application by submitting the missing information and documents before 23 October 2013 . ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0910DEC002047092

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 1992

10 septembre 1992

        Her application for asylum was rejected by the National Immigration Board (statens invandrarverk) on 2 April 1991 and the Board decided that the applicant should be

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217JUD005911915

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2020

17 décembre 2020

the application against the Republic of North Macedonia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Mr Stefan

Source officielle