Consequently, it allowed the applicant to take the child away from her mother’s home for seven days, starting on 22   December   2007. O.M.M. appealed against the judgment. 19.

  186/2014, dismissed the applicant’s appeal and confirmed the award of damages. The Court of Appeal endorsed the judgment of the Piraeus Court of First Instance.

prevented from cross-examining the people interviewed by expert, who could reasonably have been expected to give evidence along same lines as opposing side in proceedings - applicants had only become aware

As for the murder, the Plzeň Regional Court did not assess all the evidence, in particular the pieces supporting L.V.’s credibility.

Then they took their passports, beat them and dragged them outside and onto a military vehicle after which they drove away.

guardian and member of the guardianship council respectively on account of acts and omissions which had not served the best interests of V.P., as they had exchanged part of V.P.’s real estate for a piece

When she fell, he took the phone out of her purse and walked away.

    The Court considers that the applicants must have suffered non ‑ pecuniary damage on account of the violation found, and awards them jointly, on an equitable basis, EUR 10,000 under

Brabandere, Mrs Marguerite De Brabandere, Mrs Agnès De Brabandere, Mr André De Brabandere, Mr Hubert De Brabandere, Mrs Geneviève De Brabandere, Mr Louis De Brabandere, Mrs Claire De Brabandere, Mr Pierre

The convicted person was notified of the opinion of the Clemency Board as well, thereby making him or her aware of the reasons underlying the decision on release. 47.

   As the issue of the award of just satisfaction was not yet ready for decision, the Court, in the principal judgment, reserved the whole of this question.

They considered that if the Court were to find a violation, an award of EUR 10,000 for non-pecuniary damage would be sufficient.

The amount of the award shall be determined by the court. (2)     The amount of the award shall be determined by the court in each case as an amount equal to between 75 and 200 months’ minimum

Ruling on an equitable basis, it awards him EUR   3,000 under this head. C.     Costs and expenses 35.

finale du 4 août 2025, le tribunal arbitral a statué en ces termes : '' Having regard to the findings of the Sole Arbitrator set out above, and for the reasons set forth above, the Sole Arbitrator AWARDS

At noon on the day of the murder, Dor. had given them knives, which the applicant described in detail, and they had then gone away.

Ruling on an equitable basis, it awards award him EUR   2,500 under that head. B.     Costs and expenses 47.

and ought to have been aware [sic] because they were witnesses in the criminal proceedings conducted before the Split Military Court against the persons concerned ...

Taking into account all the circumstances the Court awards the second applicant EUR 4,000 to be increased by any relevant value-added tax.