CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0317JUD003436522
17 mars 2026
2020, when she still had one day remaining to bring an action, irrespective of the national courts’ conclusion as to the dies a quo (see paragraph 7 above). 20.
Page 18 sur 170
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613DEC001278410
13 juin 2023
; Nicola IRACE Born in 1941 Deceased in 2018 Heirs Liberata NANNI 1951 Francesco IRACE 1983 Fabrizio IRACE 1985 Giovanni FORNI 1943 Elisa Maria ELIA 1953 Household Lucia CASO 1944 Maria BARBATO 1969 Paola
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0923DEC000931108
23 septembre 2008
display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION PILOT-JUDGMENT PROCEDURE Application no. 9311/08 by Maria
JUGE CX PROTECTION (JCP)
68ff2f497e08341cb497a1d4
3 octobre 2025
DIAC dont le siège social est sis [Adresse 1] Représentée par Maître Anne-Marie FREZOULS, avocat au barreau de POITIERS, substituée par Maître Maria Kim VASCONI, avocat au barreau de POITIERS DEFENDEURS
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1261420-1322801
17 février 2005
In view of that finding, it did not consider it necessary to examine the complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:C100807
10 décembre 2025
Mme [G] a assigné Mme [N] en nullité absolue du mariage célébré le [Date mariage 2] 2002. Examen des moyens Sur le second moyen 6.
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2026:C300071
29 janvier 2026
le siège est [Adresse 5], a formé le pourvoi n° F 23-14.955 contre l'arrêt rendu le 22 février 2023 par la cour d'appel de Paris (pôle 4, chambre 2), dans le litige l'opposant : 1°/ à la société Maria
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231317
30 janvier 2024
(b) Did the interference pursue a legitimate aim? (c) Was the interference “necessary in a democratic society”?
ECLI:CEDH:001-192039
28 février 2019
The anti-mafia unit had been investigating for about a year a criminal scheme, allowing the unlawful receipt of money from victims of traffic accidents.
ECLI:CEDH:001-180224
18 décembre 2017
ŻŁOBIŃSKA-PERLICKA against Poland lodged on 7 November 2016 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Ms Maria Żłobińska-Perlicka, is a Polish national who was born in 1947 and lives in Wrocław.
ECLI:CEDH:001-202231
11 mars 2020
THIRD SECTION Application no. 40761/19 Joseph BARTOLO against Malta lodged on 22 July 2019 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Joseph Bartolo, is a Maltese national, who was born in 1950 and lives in Marsa
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-224534
3 avril 2023
Italy 27/05/2021 Daria PRATESI 1977 Rome Italian Federico MARINI BALESTRA Rome Rome District Court, R.G. 61705/2020 15/12/2020 04/01/2021 2. 29227/21 Triggiani v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0223DEC002069006
23 février 2010
The judge did not find the existence of a salvage contract established. 2.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9540
29 avril 2014
Law – Article 35 § 1: In its judgment in the case of Maria Atanasiu and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113DEC000869306
13 novembre 2018
The applicant, Ms Maria Nicolau, was a Romanian national, who was born in 1928 and died on 13 October 2007.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0618DEC003487617
18 juin 2024
It also held that access to the public prosecution’s service did not entail an automatic salary increase (see paragraph 9 above). 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0919DEC003776719
19 septembre 2023
On 23 April 2018 the applicant asked for the lawyer to be replaced on the grounds that she did not agree with the terms of the appeal he had prepared against her conviction. 10 .
ECLI:CEDH:001-202976
11 mai 2020
avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 11 May 2020 Published on 8 June 2020 SECOND SECTION Application no. 39344/19 Marija
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1020JUD002203903
20 octobre 2020
Ms Maria Nicola Georgescu also holds Belgian nationality.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC001531202
16 décembre 2003
The applicant maintained that other persons in the same position had filed such a claim but that the Constitutional Court did not decide on such claims.