AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221697
15 novembre 2022
15 novembre 2022
On 11 March 2010 the administrative court, after having sought and obtained a favourable decision by the Court of Appeal of Civil Jurisdiction on the jurisdiction issue, declared itself competent to hear
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0215JUD005154599
15 février 2005
15 février 2005
On 21 March 1994 the defendant co-operative submitted its memorial to which the applicant replied on 9 May 1994. 9.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0930DEC002710411
30 septembre 2014
30 septembre 2014
Romania , no. 42722/02, § 63, 4 March 2008). 33.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1014JUD005155999
14 octobre 2003
14 octobre 2003
Hearings were held on 22 February 1996 and on 6 March 1996. 16. Between 11 March and 9 September 1996 the case file was examined by the Constitutional Court. 17.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68432-68900
21 janvier 1999
21 janvier 1999
His appeal was dismissed on 17 March 1995.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0419JUD000967002
19 avril 2005
19 avril 2005
Furthermore, they submitted that the finding of a violation would constitute sufficient just satisfaction in the case. 33.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223090
16 janvier 2023
16 janvier 2023
2020 communicated on 16 January 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s fining for staging a solo protest in front of the local council of a small town, Bragadiru.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-159854
14 décembre 2015
14 décembre 2015
On 4 April 2013 the Baku Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal, finding that the first-instance court’s decision was justified.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1023DEC001356902
23 octobre 2007
23 octobre 2007
On 1 March 2001 the applicants wrote to the member of the State Duma for Chechnya, Mr Aslakhanov, and asked for his assistance in finding their three family members.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1209DEC004537404
9 décembre 2008
9 décembre 2008
On 29 March 2004 the Court of Cassation upheld the judgment of the first-instance court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-163083
27 avril 2016
27 avril 2016
On 12 March 2014 the Narimanov District Court dismissed the request, finding that there was no need to change the preventive measure of remand in custody.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1739849-1834450
3 août 2006
3 août 2006
Repetitive cases [2] and length-of-proceedings cases, with the Court’s main finding indicated, can also be found at the end of the press release.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169596
15 novembre 2016
15 novembre 2016
Russia , nos. 31039/11, 48511/11, 76810/12, 14618/13 and 13817/14, §§ 49-61, 15 March 2016.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175877
6 juillet 2017
6 juillet 2017
On 16 March 2007 A. registered another company, S., as a wholly owned subsidiary in Azerbaijan.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0416JUD004353108
16 avril 2013
16 avril 2013
The injury to the left ear could have been inflicted on 22 March 2005, while the rest of the injuries dated from 21 March 2005.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204276
8 juillet 2020
8 juillet 2020
The applicant’s son, who suffered from a mental disorder, was arrested by the police on 20 March 2015 on the grounds of having threatened his aunt.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223890
3 mars 2023
3 mars 2023
On 28 October 2021 the Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant’s complaint finding that the interference with her property rights had been proportionate on account of the State’s right to protect
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167160
9 septembre 2016
9 septembre 2016
On 18 March 2009 the Buiucani District Court admitted the appeal and annulled the decision of the traffic police of 20 November 2008.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231945
7 mars 2024
7 mars 2024
2024 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 11301/23 Elliott CUCIUREAN against the United Kingdom lodged on 9 March 2023 communicated on 7 March 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant was a serial
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244645
15 juillet 2025
15 juillet 2025
The final judgment for the rest of the accused was upheld by the Supreme Court on 2 November 2016, and became enforceable on 16 March 2017.
Source officiellePage 18 sur 1230