CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

23 798 résultats pour « Held Sutter »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1371573-1431946

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2005

16 juin 2005

  The conditions in which the applicant was held in remand prison IZ-21/2 in Tsivilsk were disputed among the parties.

Source officielle

Page 18 sur 1190

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-109427

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2011

12 décembre 2011

According to medical evidence from that centre, he suffers from arterial blood pressure, chronic ischemic illness of the heart, effects of head trauma, post-traumatic deformation of the knee of third degree

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-504148-505480

Admin. suprême

26 février 2002

26 février 2002

She received help from the Lyss Association for House and Sick Visits as from 1987. In 1989 He.M. moved in.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2294127-2474035

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2008

20 mars 2008

Mudslides have been recorded in the area every year since 1937, especially in summer.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1550080-1627613

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2006

6 janvier 2006

It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 13.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1940163-2045026

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2007

6 mars 2007

  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 1 (c), as the applicant had been held for about ten days in a situation equivalent to police custody.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1004DEC007664201

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2006

4 octobre 2006

The immunity from jurisdiction of foreign heads of State, including de facto heads of State vested with effective authority within and outside their countries and received as heads of State abroad, has

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000678311

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2017

17 janvier 2017

  Tichy, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0703JUD001361688

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 1995

3 juillet 1995

After adjustment and capitalisation of the interest, they assessed the latter two sums at FRF 703,377.77 and FRF 93,000 respectively. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0727JUD000822607

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 2010

27 juillet 2010

On 7 November and 11 December 1991 hearings were held. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181978

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2018

15 mars 2018

the applicants’ right to peaceful enjoyment of their property on account of their inability to recover their “old” foreign-currency savings deposited in Bosnian-Herzegovinian branches of banks with head

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-8930

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2013

17 octobre 2013

In sum, the State authorities had failed to provide V.K. with sufficient and reasonable protection. Conclusion : violation (unanimously).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7447

Admin. suprême

18 avril 2013

18 avril 2013

In the present case the sum originally claimed by the applicants had been EUR 554.65, and that sum had been awarded by a judgment of the Administrative Court of Appeal and paid to the applicants following

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55642

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 1995

20 novembre 1995

declared admissible the complaints regarding the length of the proceedings before the administrative courts and the fairness of the proceedings before the Conseil d'Etat to the extent that the court held

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68033-68501

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 1999

19 octobre 1999

  The hearing was held on 11   December 1992. On 30 June 1993 one of the judges participating in that hearing retired.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68116-68584

Admin. suprême

29 février 2000

29 février 2000

The court of appeal reduced the sum payable by the applicant but held that he had not proved that the bank had been at fault.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-622912-628137

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2002

25 septembre 2002

The article was entitled “Caselli, the judge with the white tuft” ( Caselli, il ciuffo bianco della giustizia ) and bore the sub-title “Catholic schooling, communist militancy – like his friend Violante

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1010638-1047517

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2004

27 mai 2004

Consequently, it held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1005JUD000439502

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2004

5 octobre 2004

    On 4 September 1990 the District Court held a hearing and requested the parties to submit motions. 9.     On 26 October and 12 December 1990 the District Court held hearings.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2047352-2173767

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2007

28 juin 2007

It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Articles 8 and 13. The Court further held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1.

Source officielle