The applicants complained that their right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ failure to properly and timeously notify them of hearings in the civil proceedings

complaints fall to be examined solely under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing

    The applicants complained that their right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ failure to properly and timely notify them of hearings in the civil proceedings

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

examined in the domestic proceedings, in violation of Article 6 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing

of the case where a complainant has requested a hearing within the time-limit.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    None of the applicants, apart from Mr Yakovlev, were able to attend the hearings before the courts of first instance.

    The Government did not contest the fact that the Ministry was summoned to the hearing of 28 September 2015.

He insisted that he had not been notified of the date and time of the appeal hearing in his case. As a result, he had been unable to take part in the appeal hearing on 15 February 2005. A.

  58 of 1998 was amended and the duty to hold a public hearing was introduced. 23.

Under Article 390, a request for the acknowledgement of a fact is examined by a district court at a hearing, in the presence of all parties who have an interest in the case.

It relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which, insofar as relevant, reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ...

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 6   §   1 “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within