The Skopje Court of First Instance found the applicant and M.N. guilty on 24 January 2014. She was given a one-year suspended prison sentence while M.N. was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment.

On 7 December 2012 the Zhytomyr Korolyovskyy District Court found the applicant guilty of abuse of office with a view to gaining profit (an administrative corruption-related offence) and fined him UAH

The officers searched the applicant, his bag and his vehicle and found 500,000 Netherlands guilders (EUR 233,056).

A district court found her guilty of petty hooliganism and sentenced her to ten days’ detention.

At the close of a trial, held in the same year before a National Security Court which included a military judge, the applicants were found guilty of membership of and assistance to an illegal organisation

    The Court notes that Article 6 § 2 applies to persons “charged with a criminal offence and safeguards the right to be “presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law”.

    On 8 June 2007 the Ștefan-Vodă District Court found the applicant guilty on the strength of the statements made by B. (a co-accused), S.

law and declared guilty by an effective court judgment.

In any event, the opinions expressed cannot amount to declarations by a public official of the applicant’s guilt which would encourage the public to believe him or her guilty and prejudge the assessment

Germany, op. cit., p. 25, para. 62), provided that those expressions of suspicion do not amount to a determination of the accused's guilt (ibid, para. 60).

        Article 6 para. 2 (Art. 6-2) guarantees that "everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law".

She also maintained that the prosecutor had in fact been wholly absent from the trial court’s hearing and that the applicant had never repented or admitted his guilt.

    The applicant was found guilty for the creation of pornographic material following an initial examination of his case by the District Court, based on, among others, witness statements and

He complained that Mr Kolesnikov’s statements had encouraged the public to believe him guilty and prejudged the assessment of the facts by the competent court.

It found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to one year’s imprisonment, replaced with community service.

He considered this a “heavy price to pay” for ensuring that no guilty person was ever the recipient of compensation. 21.

       On 6 March 1991, the applicant was found guilty of possession of a firearm in suspicious circumstances and of receiving stolen goods (the firearm in question).

    The applicant was arrested on 17 February 2000 and following a trial by jury, by a judgment of 4 October 2007 confirmed on appeal on 28   July 2011, he was found guilty of the homicide

    On 22 April 2021 a court, consisting of B.P. as presiding judge and two other judges, accepted the guilty plea of F.D.R.