CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-768251-782913
10 juin 2003
In the judgment given today in respect of just satisfaction, the Court decided unanimously to award the applicant 60,000 euros (EUR) for pecuniary damage, EUR 12,000 for non-pecuniary damage
Page 18 sur 118
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248936
5 février 2026
1 and Article 13 of the Convention relating to damage, destruction and/or continuous lack of access to property arising from the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the lack of any effective
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1120JUD005487208
20 novembre 2012
Non-pecuniary damage “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0325JUD007481601
25 mars 2003
It awarded the applicant 1,500 Polish zlotys (PLN) by way of pecuniary damage and PLN 15,000 under the head of non-pecuniary damage together with interest.
ECLI:CEDH:001-116609
18 janvier 2013
The administrative proceedings for damages The applicant lodged a claim for compensation for non-pecuniary damage sustained by being detained in poor conditions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0615JUD000417103
15 juin 2006
Damage 51.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0731JUD007268301
31 juillet 2007
damage (physical or mental suffering) ... the court may impose on the perpetrator an obligation to pay pecuniary compensation for that damage...”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD006885116
30 juin 2020
Damage 78.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1822687-3862636
19 octobre 2006
By way of just satisfaction, the Court awarded the applicant EUR 35,000 for pecuniary damage, EUR 2,000 for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 100 for costs and expenses.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0411JUD007753001
11 avril 2006
Proceedings for damages 8.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4756
1 juillet 2003
The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) asked the Chief Constable of the RUC to conduct further inquiries.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1019JUD000196807
19 octobre 2010
La Cour constate que les griefs tirés de l'article 5 §§ 3 et 4 des requérants MM.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1005DEC001200786
5 octobre 1987
The applicant demanded damages from the newspaper publisher before the Vienna Regional Court.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1007JUD000315820
7 octobre 2025
He was locked in at all times, and under the constant supervision of the border control authorities. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1219JUD001144485
19 décembre 1990
Under this provision the applicant sought compensation for damage and reimbursement of expenses. A. Damage 40.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1217JUD003334896
17 décembre 2004
CBN, a company based in Constanţa. 17.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1206DEC006312915
6 décembre 2016
As a result of such incidents the applicants lived in constant fear for their lives.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0927JUD007770801
27 septembre 2005
Damage 1. Non ‑ pecuniary damage 30. The applicant claimed 1,000,000 [1] Slovakian korunas (SKK) in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0118JUD004548206
18 janvier 2011
The applicant claimed compensation in the amount of NLG 1,500,000 for non-pecuniary damage and NLG 475,055.30 for pecuniary damage (loss of profits, extra accountants' and financing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0117JUD005954800
17 janvier 2008
It found that the State Responsibility for Damage Act only concerned damages resulting from administrative decisions or acts in the exercise of administrative functions.