CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0214JUD002029507
14 février 2019
Decides to join the applications; 2. Declares the applications admissible; 3.
Page 18 sur 31
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0113DEC001757990
13 janvier 1993
The claim was heard in the High Court from 28 November to 2 December 1988.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0715JUD003868306
15 juillet 2010
In December 2008 he was provided with an opportunity to copy the entire case file. 45.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD003804704
18 octobre 2011
On 2 December 2005 the Volgograd Tsentralniy District Court did not find grounds for quashing the decision of 14 July 2005.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0117JUD003979705
17 janvier 2013
On 20 December 2003 the applicant was recognised in the proceedings as a victim. 22.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0404JUD001210205
4 avril 2013
xa0; December 2005. 27.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1014REP001576789
14 octobre 1992
Audrey Glover of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0105DEC005699510
5 janvier 2017
In addition to the amounts noted above, the applicant received a lump sum payment of TRY 8,937.5 (approximately EUR 4,335 in December 2010) on an unspecified date in
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0428DEC002043611
28 avril 2020
On 30 December 2010 the investigation was resumed. It appears to still be pending. 28 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0316JUD002384719
16 mars 2021
Turkey , no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629JUD005195208
29 juin 2021
Several more persons were questioned in November 2003, but their testimony did not reveal any new information and on 4 December 2003 the Sterlitamak prosecutor’s office suspended the criminal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0213JUD007105614
13 février 2025
On 23 December 2011 the trial court absolved Duty Officer K. from criminal liability under the Amnesty Act of 2011 on the ground that K. had a dependent minor son. 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0504REP001894991
4 mai 1993
1ère Chambre
69eafa2ccdc6046d4756ca71
23 avril 2026
[A] [J] [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Représenté par Me Aurélie SOLEILHAVOUP de la SELARL JURIDOME, avocat au barreau de CUSSET/VICHY INTIME et DEMANDEUR À L'INCIDENT Après avoir entendu les représentants
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422JUD003155707
22 avril 2021
Ukraine , no. 38765/05, §§ 67-81, 15 December 2011). 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004JUD006954612
4 octobre 2016
Accordingly, on 11 December 2007 the Hatay Civil Court of First Instance dismissed the case against the Municipality.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506DEC004791699
6 mai 2003
By letter dated 23 December 2002, the applicants’ lawyer informed the Registry that the accused’s appeal had been rejected on 29 June 2001.
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1048845-1085469
8 juillet 2004
Marea Cameră a decis să ţină o audiere asupra admisibilităţii şi fondului cererii, iar preşedintele a invitat guvernul român să participe la această audiere.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023JUD002266306
23 octobre 2012
On 2 December 2009 the above complaints were communicated to the Government.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD000688702
16 décembre 2010
Russia , no. 65859/01, § 59, 7 December 2006; Ribitsch v. Austria , 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336; and Krastanov v. Bulgaria , no. 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004). 87.