CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410JUD003370714
10 avril 2018
fall under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Khodorkovskiy v.
Page 17 sur 63777
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003714918
21 janvier 2021
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 5. The applicant complained that his pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0311JUD004176319
11 mars 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0504JUD002418508
4 mai 2017
They relied on Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, which read as follows: Article 5 § 3 “3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0722JUD004005220
22 juillet 2021
He relied on Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 5 § 3 “3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0220JUD001194808
20 février 2014
The Court considers that these complaints fall to be examined under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, which provides as follows: “3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0610JUD003665320
10 juin 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0611JUD001927903
11 juin 2013
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 49. The applicant complained about the length of his pre-trial detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0921JUD001008421
21 septembre 2023
Javadov , a lawyer based in Azerbaijan. 3. The Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applicants’ complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1109JUD004913210
9 novembre 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0504JUD000061115
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0922JUD000275007
22 septembre 2016
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0505JUD001773008
5 mai 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0409JUD001997019
9 avril 2020
They relied on Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 5 § 3 “3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0902JUD001710119
2 septembre 2021
The Court considers that that approach was incompatible with the requirements of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0226JUD000620007
26 février 2013
Declares the complaint under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention admissible and the remainder of the application inadmissible; 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118JUD004277021
18 janvier 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0213JUD001083824
13 février 2025
He relied on Article 5 § 3 of the Convention. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0113JUD002331215
13 janvier 2022
The Court considers that the applicant’s complaints fall to be examined under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows, insofar as relevant: “3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0606JUD003554021
6 juin 2024