CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625JUD006303411
25 juin 2019
Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage)
Page 17 sur 6073
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD002183810
1 juin 2017
Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1122JUD002865005
22 novembre 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1108JUD001953508
8 novembre 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1010JUD001747509
10 octobre 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1015JUD004566805
15 octobre 2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0505JUD000961614
5 mai 2026
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0309JUD004566805
9 mars 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1130JUD002277507
30 novembre 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0828JUD001034603
28 août 2018
They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court in so far as the awards under Article 41 were concerned. 5 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1116JUD001753604
16 novembre 2021
En conséquence, il demandait la révision de l’arrêt, au sens de l’article 80 du règlement de la Cour. 4 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0703JUD001784991
3 juillet 1997
Dommage matériel - réparation (Article 41 - Frais et dépens;Dommage matériel;Satisfaction équitable);Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant (Article 41 - Préjudice moral;Satisfaction équitable
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0521JUD000312904
21 mai 2015
The case originated in an application (no. 3129/04) against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
Chiragov et autresc/Arménie
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD001321605
12 décembre 2017
Au titre de l’article 41 de la Convention, les requérants sollicitaient une satisfaction équitable s’élevant à plusieurs millions d’euros (EUR) pour dommage et pour frais et dépens. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD000911704
15 janvier 2015
It further held that there had been no violation of Article 11 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0125JUD003401507
25 janvier 2018
It also found violations of Article 5 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention on account of a lack of sufficient legal grounds for two periods of his pre-trial detention and on account of its excessive length.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11776
The question of the application of Article 41 of the Convention was reserved in both cases.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1009JUD005834909
9 octobre 2018
In a judgment delivered on 24 October 2017, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 2 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0514JUD001403109
14 mai 2020
Under Article 41 of the Convention the applicant sought just satisfaction in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1006JUD002909708
6 octobre 2020
2020 FINAL 06/01/2021 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention.