Accordingly, the application to the case of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.

Early , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 10 January 2005, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits

29 § 3 de la Convention, Vu la déclaration du 3 juillet 2008, par laquelle le gouvernement défendeur invite la Cour à rayer la requête du rôle et la réponse de la requérante à cette déclaration, Après

Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Early, greffier de section , Vu la requête susmentionnée introduite le 24 septembre 2001, Vu la décision de la Cour d’examiner conjointement la recevabilité et le fond de l’affaire comme le permet l’article

Accordingly, the application to the case of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.

Accordingly, the application to the case of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.

In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Accordingly, the application to the case of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.

In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) and (b) of the Convention.

Accordingly, the application to the case of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Accordingly, the application to the case of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.