The Court notes that member States have a more extensive margin of appreciation in determining the exact nature of the legal regime to be made available to same-sex couples.

On 18 June 2019, the Government made a request to restore the application to the Court’s list of cases, as in the course of the proceedings to enforce the Court’s decision, they were informed that the

Popov submitted in reply that he had made a disclaimer of an inheritance for the benefit of his mother. Nonetheless, he had applied to a notary for a succession certificate.

THE LAW After unsuccessful friendly-settlement negotiations, the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make unilateral declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints

Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal question raised by the applicant (see above) and that there is no need to examine this complaint (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

After unsuccessful friendly-settlement negotiations, the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make unilateral declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints.

He stated that he had made the statements in question as A.H.’s lawyer and that they had been made in the context of protecting A.H.’s right not to be subjected to ill-treatment.

It finds that, as established by the domestic court, the applicants were made to bear a disproportionate burden.

That order was made on the basis of an appeal by the public prosecutor received by the court earlier that day, which was served on the applicant on 1   December 2017.

The judgment made no mention of the applicant’s specific complaints about the lawfulness of the evidence used against him. 16.     The applicant appealed, reiterating his arguments.

With respect to application no. 24056/20, the Court notes further that the applicant did not make any claim in respect of non-pecuniary damage; it therefore makes no award under this head.

    The applicants’ convictions were based among other evidence on the statements of one or more witnesses for prosecution, which were made during pre-trial stages of the proceedings and read

BALSAMO against San Marino and Angela BALSAMO against San Marino lodged on 8 March 2017 and 10 March 2017 respectively STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant in application no. 20319/17, Ms Valentina Balsamo

They maintained that no adequate compensation had been made available to them for the deprivation of their property.

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE VALENCIENNES POLE SOCIAL JUGEMENT DU HUIT JUILLET DEUX MIL VINGT QUATRE N° RG 22/00312 - N° Portalis DBZT-W-B7G-FZMU N°MINUTE : 24/293 Le vingt six avril deux mil vingt quatre

    On the same date the Regional Court decided to adjourn the examination of that application until “essential circumstances necessary to make a ruling on the application were clarified”.

Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 4   November 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Ana Maria Guerra Martins , President ,   Anne Louise Bormann,   Sebastian Răduleţu , judges , and Valentin

Mare   Coloman NAGY 07/11/1959 Satu Mare   Tiberiu SIPOS 27/07/1959 Satu Mare   Carolina Stefania NEMES CZIER 25/12/1975 Satu Mare   Alexandrina PRINCZ 30/01/1963 Satu Mare  

Ms Maria Luz Casado Perez, Ms Daria Amelia Casado Perez, Ms   Maria Teresa Sales Aige and Mr Javier Bruna Reverter, were born in 1954, 1952, 1950, 1950, 1951 and 1957 respectively and live in Valencia