It delivered that decision in view of, among other circumstances, the fact that the child had been living with the mother for several years and that her relationship with the mother was closer than that

While the applicants listed at nos. 6 and 8 have requested that they be allowed to pursue her application in her stead, being the heirs of the deceased, the Court notes that they are also applicants in

    If the Government’s theory is accepted that the explosive device was planted by unidentified persons driving a red car (see paragraph 24 above), there is no logical explanation why they would

The step has produced good results as the average number of judgments reserved for more than 6 and 9 months has dropped by 50%, and that of interim decisions reserved for more than 2 months has dropped

However, there is nothing to suggest that the conditions of detention at that facility were significantly different during the period when the applicant was detained there, namely in 2008.

Although the Combined Divisions acknowledged that there had been different interpretations, they held that the divergence was merely apparent since even the judgments which opposed the principle of joint

    The applicants alleged that there had been a violation of Articles 6 and 10 of the Convention. 4.

that they are operating effectively.

The Combined Divisions therefore concluded that, if there was more than one offender, confiscation must be ordered against each of them only in respect of the shares of the proceeds they had actually obtained

They also submitted that they had made a prima facie case that their brother had been abducted by State agents and that the Government failed to provide a plausible explanation to the events.

Further, prisoners stated that the food they received was better than that provided elsewhere. Moreover, no problems were reported as regards the heating.

Code ( Miljöbalken ), that there had not been any procedural irregularities that could have had a bearing on the decision and that there were no other reason to find that it contravened the law. 12.

It also examined the witnesses as proposed by the applicant, but it did not give weight to their statements that they had heard the vet saying to the applicant that the cow died from a bite, because there

In any event, there is no evidence that the remedies which were available in theory could work effectively in practice when it came to prison conditions and the treatment of prisoners.

They also considered that they had not been responsible for the lapse of the action.

la Cour, membre de la SELARL AEDIFICO DEFENDERESSE SAS Terra Proxim,a[Adresse 2] comparaissant par Maître Mélanie MAINGOURD, Avocat au Barreau de Montpellier, membre du cabinet CASANOVA –, [D] – THAÏ

Thierry, rapporteur, M.

  The Government state that the applicant never complained to the judicial authorities that he was ill-treated in custody.

It argued that the file contained no information which could lead to the conclusion that there was negative information on the applicant’s personality.