CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

9 930 résultats pour « Peter ALEFELD Me »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0707JUD000732916

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2022

7 juillet 2022

    The application concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment by the police and the potentially racist motives behind the incident, given the applicant’s Roma origin.

Page 17 sur 497

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD000185808

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2018

4 décembre 2018

In the shower room there was one water tap per ten inmates and one toilet per twelve inmates.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1020DEC003182702

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2010

20 octobre 2010

The applicant challenged the alleged bias of a Constitutional Court judge, doing so on an unclear basis.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0307JUD002849617

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2019

7 mars 2019

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0307JUD004877015

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2019

7 mars 2019

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238550

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2024

14 novembre 2024

xa0; SECOND SECTION Application no. 54624/20 Mehmet KAYA against Türkiye lodged on 3 November 2020 communicated on 14 November 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0503JUD001812003

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2011

3 mai 2011

3 m 2 per person was respected.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4914

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2003

29 avril 2003

Family visits were thereafter limited to one per month. It was further alleged that the applicant was beaten on several occasions in 1998.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2728223-2981727

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2009

12 mai 2009

  The applicants, Mr Kevin Gillan and Ms Pennie Quinton, are British nationals who were born in 1977 and 1971 respectively and live in London.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD007184613

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2025

10 juillet 2025

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0830DEC003468420

Admin. suprême

30 août 2022

30 août 2022

Serghides , President,   Anja Seibert-Fohr ,   Peeter Roosma , judges, and Olga Chernishova, Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 16 June 2020, Having regard

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706JUD003306805

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2010

6 juillet 2010

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE CONVENTION 14.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68179-68647

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2001

31 janvier 2001

  Representatives of the parties   Government:   Karlheinz Stöhr , Agent , Susanne Wasum , Counsel ;   Applicant:   Alexander Goepfert , Counsel , Peter Rädler , Counsel , Dieter

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0516DEC004036622

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2024

16 mai 2024

KIS and Béla KIS against Hungary (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 16 May 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Gilberto Felici , President ,   Péter

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55501

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 1990

13 décembre 1990

that the case originated in an application against the United Kingdom lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 31 August 1981 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by Mr Michael Peter

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404DEC000258216

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2017

4 avril 2017

Peter, a lawyer practising in Bucharest. 2.     The Portuguese Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M. F. da Graça Carvalho, Deputy Attorney General. 3.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68169-68637

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2001

30 janvier 2001

parties   Government:   Ruma Mandal , Agent,     Philip Sales , Counsel,     Steven Bramley , Geoff Underwood , Advisers;     Applicants:   Ben Emmerson , Peter

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1123DEC005456621

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2023

23 novembre 2023

In particular, the Court has found that an effective remedy is available in Hungary to provide redress for the alleged grievances (see Szaxon v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224844

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2023

29 avril 2023

ill-treatment of the fourth applicant by police during arrest, the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against all four applicants and the excessive length of ensuing constitutional proceedings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC002111609

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2011

27 septembre 2011

  m per person).

Source officielle