CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

21 659 résultats pour « Neguede »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0527JUD002656505

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2008

27 mai 2008

became known that her needs could be assessed and the then availability of appropriate treatment decided.” 16.

Source officielle

Page 17 sur 1083

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0911DEC001596005

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2012

11 septembre 2012

188.96pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 15960/05 Vasile Eugen NEGREA

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-204875

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2020

9 septembre 2020

margin-bottom:0pt } .sCEF2C954 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2020)168 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Negura

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0306JUD003595020

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2025

6 mars 2025

The Migration Agency concluded that A.H. was in need of suitable institutional accommodation and that this needed to be expedited since his mental health was affected by his living situation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-139586

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2013

19 novembre 2013

and the possibility to meet those needs in the SIZO.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011DEC000314516

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2016

11 octobre 2016

The court found that the applicants were able adequately to take care of X’s basic daily needs. However, as a vulnerable child, X had a special need for contact and emotional interaction.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0206JUD000264822

Admin. suprême

6 février 2024

6 février 2024

While the report of the joint forensic psychological and psychiatric examination stated that the applicant needed compulsory treatment in a psychiatric institution, no justification was provided for such

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502JUD002195115

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2017

2 mai 2017

The expert opinion is that two or three years are needed for his brain condition to stabilise after the gamma knife surgery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181911

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2018

6 mars 2018

He therefore needed to undergo the necessary medical examinations. 28.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1012DEC002168793

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 1994

12 octobre 1994

The courts established that although the boy had developed favourably he still needed a firm and secure social framework.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219405

Admin. suprême

31 août 2022

31 août 2022

His criminal proceedings began on 21 March 2017 but needed to be postponed due to the ill health of the trial judge.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1005DEC001227086

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 1988

5 octobre 1988

Sometimes she seemed to forget that her own needs should be secondary to the needs of the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1129DEC002113205

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2007

29 novembre 2007

There was thus a need to avoid de facto discrimination distorting democratic processes in favour of the wealthy and powerful.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0418JUD005101013

Admin. suprême

18 avril 2024

18 avril 2024

    In the second request, regarding copies of declarations of the mayor and some other local council officials, no reference was made by the applicant as to why he needed the information sought

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0214JUD000417810

Admin. suprême

14 février 2019

14 février 2019

    The Law on Alienation of Property for the Needs of Society and the State (in force from 30 December 2006) 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0214JUD000441310

Admin. suprême

14 février 2019

14 février 2019

    The Law on Alienation of Property for the needs of Society and the State (in force from 30 December 2006) 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0214JUD000681810

Admin. suprême

14 février 2019

14 février 2019

    The Law on Alienation of Property for the Needs of Society and the State (in force from 30 December 2006) 27.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2005:286

CJUE

12 mai 2005

12 mai 2005

#Liikmesriigi kohustuse rikkumine - Direktiiv 91/439/EMÜ - Juhiluba - Minimaalne nõutav vanus teatavate sõidukite juhtimiseks - Võimalus juhtida erineva kategooria sõidukeid kui need, mille osas juhiluba

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2009:19

CJUE

20 janvier 2009

20 janvier 2009

#Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH pret Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu: Bundesgerichtshof - Vācija.

Source officielle
?

TRIBUNAL_UE

ECLI:EU:T:2004:112

droit européen

22 avril 2004

22 avril 2004

#Community trade mark - Partial refusal to register - Withdrawal of the application - No need to adjudicate.#Case T-292/03.

Source officielle