March 2004. 10 .

They considered that, in this respect, finding the violation constitutes sufficient just satisfaction. They also offered to pay the applicants 5,000   euros (EUR) jointly for costs and expenses.

    On 18 December 2012 the Katowice Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s action, finding that from 20 April 2010 to 9 March 2012 the applicant had been detained in cells above the minimum

    The applicant was represented by Mr Victor Marcu, a lawyer practising in Edineţ.

The Court sees no reason to disagree with those findings.

  Romania [Committee], nos. 18780/04 and 13111/05, 27 March 2012).

The Government therefore disputed the Court’s finding of a violation of Article 38 of the Convention. 4.

    On 25 February 2016 the Suwałki Regional Court ordered the applicant’s detention until 23 March 2016 with a view to extraditing him.

12 and 13 March 2003. 11.

(d) Jeffrey started a job on 13 March 1978, but left it - according to the Government, of his own accord - on 31 March.

On 18 June 2007 he submitted to the Ankara Administrative Court his objections in writing to the findings of the experts. 15.

The applicant unsuccessfully challenged that finding before the Construction Police. On 19   March 2005 the Construction Police issued a new demolition order, which was executed on 22 May 2006.

On 4 March 1998 the Bratislava Regional Court held a hearing and decided to adjourn the case. On 18 March 1998 the applicant submitted further information.

Furthermore, the Frankfurt am Main Regional Court’s judgment of 13 March 2008 was based on that violation of the Convention.

    On 17 March 2006 the applicant lodged an appeal against the decision of 3 March 2006, seeking to have the proceedings terminated and to be released.

    Between 30 May 1989 and 23 March 1999, the bailiff made 18 attempts to recover possession, on 30 May 1989, 5 March 1990, 10 October 1990, 11 December 1990, 18 April 1991, 16 December 1991

The Government had not put forward any evidence which prompted the Court to doubt its relevant findings in its previous case-law.

    On 14 March 2001 the public prosecutor issued a decision of non ‑ prosecution relying on the medical reports dated 24 February, 3   March and   8   March 2001, according

On 3 March 2011 the Nasimi District Court extended the applicant’s detention pending trial by one month, until 8 April 2011.