Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

The District Court held a hearing and took complex documentary evidence and oral submissions from the parties.

It stated that its decision had been given “in an open hearing” held on that date. However, the introductory part of the decision contains no mention of the persons present at the hearing.

During the oral hearing, the regional court had dismissed the applicant’s request for the whereabouts of the police informant ( Vertrauensperson der Kriminalpolizei ), T., to be ascertained and for T.

Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (failure to notify the applicant of the other party’s submissions or of a hearing

The applicant had failed to raise his concern about the incitement during the oral hearing and he had not asked the regional court to refrain from using evidence obtained by means of the undercover police

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

    The applicants complained that their right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ refusal of their requests to appear in court.

He further argued that, even assuming that he had prior knowledge of the date and venue of the hearing but had not been present for some reason, it had still been open to the court to adjourn the hearing

At a hearing held on 2 March 2009 the applicant again raised the issue of E.D.’s lack of impartiality.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

, applied to the Court of Appeal for a postponement of the hearing.

However, he had not done so, but had agreed to the reading-out of those statements during the hearing.

During the preliminary hearing held on the same date, the court decided to leave the request unexamined, referring to the fact that the SRSIP was involved in the proceedings as a third party and that it

    Several hearings were held before the Dâmbovița County   Court. 20.

    The applicants complained that their right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ refusal of their requests to appear in court.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Demaria, a lawyer practising in Split; the decision to give notice of the complaints concerning the right to a fair hearing and the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions to the Croatian Government

falls to be examined solely under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which, in so far as relevant, reads: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing