CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

13 830 résultats pour « Guilly »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114542

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2012

18 octobre 2012

Furthermore, a respective finding of guilt had to become final before it could be held against the person concerned.

Source officielle

Page 17 sur 692

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC119 résultats

Journal officiel
Modifications diverses

SCI PLAISANCE-GUILLY

SIREN 439983677Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce d'Orléans

01/04/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

LE GUILLY PEINTURE

SIREN 811743129Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de quimper

21/11/2025

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

GUILLY ENERGIES

SIREN 899370324Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de bordeaux

11/11/2025

Voir →

Modifications diverses

SCEA DE GUILLY

SIREN 803603943Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Bourges

04/11/2025

Voir →

Modifications diverses

SCI GUILLY

SIREN 498009380Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Vannes

02/09/2025

Voir →

CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2055877-2175646

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2007

12 juillet 2007

He was found guilty, in particular, of acting with intent to commit 11 counts of genocide, murder of 22 people and dangerous assault and deprivation of liberty.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0603JUD004843118

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2021

3 juin 2021

    By a judgment of 23 March 2012, the Court of Magistrates found the applicant guilty of the charges against him and fined him EUR 400.

Source officielle
CC

soc

6079b10c9ba5988459c5114d

Cassation

19 juin 1987

19 juin 1987

X... comme titulaire et suppléant pour les élections des délégués du personnel devant se dérouler le 15 avril 1986 au sein de l'établissement de Guilly de la société Graines d'élite clause ; que cette

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0930DEC000040203

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2004

30 septembre 2004

Moreover, the majority dismissed the assertions that, according to the applicants, the Indictment Division made categorical assertions of their guilt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0531DEC001610390

Admin. suprême

31 mai 1991

31 mai 1991

  Pölten Regional Court (Kreisgericht) pronounced the divorce on 10 October 1983 stating that both parties were guilty.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7066

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2000

27 juin 2000

The district court was empowered either to uphold the applicant’s acquittal or to find him guilty after carrying out a thorough review of the issue of his guilt or innocence allowing, if appropriate, the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0403DEC002945302

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2007

3 avril 2007

guilty according to law.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2306167-2468060

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2008

26 mars 2008

On 2 December 2002 the same district court found the applicant guilty of the charges under Article 319 of the Criminal Code.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5968

Admin. suprême

25 juillet 2000

25 juillet 2000

The Procuratore del Fisco also appealed and argued that both applicants should have been found guilty of being in possession of drugs with intent to deal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7693

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2013

9 juillet 2013

In April 2010 they were found guilty of the charges against them and sentenced to seven years, four months and twenty days’ imprisonment each.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144543

Admin. suprême

5 mai 2014

5 mai 2014

On 26 April 2004 the Leninskiy District Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to twelve years’ imprisonment.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2872317-3157967

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2009

29 septembre 2009

In 2004, Mr Kiss was found guilty of aggravated assault and sentenced to four years in prison; Mr Talabér was convicted of vandalism and sentenced to a fine.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-81554

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2007

20 juin 2007

  The European Court found that the District Court had pronounced the applicant's guilt before it had been established according to law and that the Supreme Court had failed to rectify this “error

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2215

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2008

24 avril 2008

decision might raise an issue under Article 6 §   2 if supporting reasoning, which could not be dissociated from the operative provisions, amounted in substance to the determination of the person’s guilt

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228818

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2023

9 octobre 2023

the absence of a formal finding of guilt?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-99656

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2010

3 juin 2010

Amsterdam Court of Appeal court rejected their application for compensation on the grounds that, while they had been acquitted of attempted murder and manslaughter, they would certainly have been found guilty

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1693

Admin. suprême

10 février 2009

10 février 2009

On the same day a district court found him guilty of swearing at police employees and breaching public order shortly after his arrival at the police station.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180344

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2017

19 décembre 2017

He submitted in particular that his guilt to the attempted theft had not been established by a criminal court and that therefore there had been no legal grounds for his dismissal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9618

Admin. suprême

10 février 1995

10 février 1995

France - 15175/89 Judgment 10.2.1995 Article 6 Article 6-2 Presumption of innocence Person in police custody described as guilty by senior police officers at press conference with Minister of the Interior

Source officielle