CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1018JUD003995419
18 octobre 2022
It only results in providing compensation for a delay for a limited period of time (see, for example, Antonovi v. Bulgaria, no.
Page 17 sur 868
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0925DEC004977199
25 septembre 2001
In finding that the delay did not amount to an abuse of process, the Judge Advocate stated that: “... there has been ... considerable delay in this matter.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1018JUD004012419
It only results in providing compensation for delay for a limited period of time (see, for example, Antonovi v. Bulgaria , no.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0111REP002143793
11 janvier 1995
Delay in the execution of a warrant is, therefore, a factor which may be taken into account in determining whether to uphold a plea in bar of trial on grounds of delay. 32.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-234859
13 juin 2024
concrete steps have been taken to introduce the legislative reforms necessary to protect the applicants and others in their situation from similar, continuous violations of their Convention rights; DEEPLY
ECLI:CEDH:001-242461
6 mars 2025
well as granting victim status to all applicants concerned; CALLED UPON the authorities to enforce the domestic court’s judgment in the Georgian Muslim Relations and Others case without further delay
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0325JUD001351902
25 mars 2008
In cases where a judgment in the applicant’s favour had been enforced with a delay, the payment of compensation for the delay could, in principle, constitute appropriate and sufficient redress.
10 SS
CETAT:CETATEXT000007694074
6 novembre 1985
DIRIGEE CONTRE LA DECISION DE L'AGENCE NATIONALE POUR L'INDEMNISATION DES FRANCAIS D'OUTRE-MER EN DATE DU 7 MARS 1980 LUI PROPOSANT UNE INDEMNISATION DE 11 508 F POUR LE TERRAIN DONT IL A ETE DEPOSSEDE A DELY-IBRAHIM
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1127DEC000841605
27 novembre 2008
He asserted that delays in the present case were caused first by the Public Prosecutor’s Office and then by the Supreme Court.
Chambre 7
686c40c8dd7001754d625ebb
2 juillet 2025
[K] [D], né le 11 Octobre 1959 à ST PANTALEON DE LARCHE, comparant en personne, demeurant Aux Bâtiments 810 LD LESTRADE 19360 COSNAC, - Me CHRISTIAN ME DELPY, Avocat 3 Avenue Bourzat - Résidence les
Cour d'Appel
6253cb70bd3db21cbdd8d7a5
22 février 2011
représenté par Me Jean-Pierre GARNERIE, avoué à la Cour assisté de Me Christian DELPY, avocat au barreau de BRIVE substitué par Me BRANCO, avocat Laurence Y..., de nationalité Française née le 22 Juillet
6253cd35bd3db21cbdd929b5
5 novembre 2015
C/ SCI LAURA, intervenante volontaire, SA BNP PARIBAS PERSONAL FINANCE, venant aux droits SA LASER COFINOGA JCS/ MCM VENTE FORCEE Grosse délivrée à Me CHARTIER-PREVOST et Me DELPY, avocats
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314DEC001566312
14 mars 2017
In any event, the Court considers that in the cases in which there had already been a delay of more than ten years, the judgments need to be enforced without further delay.
4ème chambre
69ea6517cdc6046d474b78f1
15 janvier 2026
TRIBUNAL DES ACTIVITES ECONOMIQUES DE NANTERRE JUGEMENT PRONONCE LE 15 janvier 2026 4ème CHAMBRE DEMANDEURS GENERALE POUR L'ENFANT [Adresse 1] comparant par Me Nicole DELAY [Adresse 2] [Adresse 3] [Courriel
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-182518
29 mars 2018
Has there been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account of the overall delays in completing the restitution process (see Kavaliauskas and Others v.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49256
25 février 1985
which elapsed between the filing of his appeal and the date of the decision by the Court of Appeal confirming his conviction was not a reasonable delay within the meaning of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art
soc
613721eecd580146773f8d88
22 juillet 1993
(Nord), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 12 octobre 1990 par la cour d'appel de Douai (5ème chambre sociale), au profit de la société anonyme Delcy, sise 4,rand Place à Illies (Nord), défenderesse à la
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316DEC001667902
16 mars 2010
While in the Republika Srpska no delays were alleged, the same is not true for the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Brčko District.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC003053620
8 avril 2021
Dominika Szilvia Budapest Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention – The applicant’s obligatory one-year review was carried out with a more than 2 months delay.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0911DEC003919798
11 septembre 2001
In the Court of Appeal, they highlight the delay of a year in providing the court with transcripts of evidence from the trial and state that, to the extent that that delay was attributable to the court