Damage 78.     The first applicant claimed EUR 25,461.87 in respect of pecuniary damage (arrears of alimony payment together with interest).

At that time the applicant had not submitted a civil claim for non-pecuniary damages from R.J. 17.

Article 25 “Everyone has the right to compensation for moral and material damage caused by the unlawful action of any person.” 50 .

    Article 2043 of the Civil Code provides: “Any unlawful act which causes damage to another will render the perpetrator liable in damages under the civil law.” 23.

    Damage 77.     The applicant claimed EUR 431,590 in respect of pecuniary damage and EUR 1,000,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 78.

the State Responsibility for Damage Act.

Grounds for liability Section 1045(1) “Anyone who causes damage to another shall compensate it, unless he or she proves that the damage occurred through no fault of his or her own.”

    During 1990 the military prosecutor’s offices in Bucharest, Brașov, Timişoara, Oradea, Constanţa, Craiova, Bacău, Târgu Mureş and Cluj ‑ Napoca opened investigations into the use of

    Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations (the Home Office Guidelines of 1984) provided that only chief constables or assistant chief constables were entitled to

Le 28 juillet 2009, le juge des enfants a ordonné une mesure d'investigation et d'orientation, confiée au Service d'action éducative de Dammarie-les-Lys et qui a été prorogée, le 18 janvier 2010, pour

propriétés bâties et de taxe d’enlèvement des ordures ménagères auxquelles elle a été assujettie au titre de l’année 2021, à raison d’un local sis 54 rue des Frères Thibault et 537 quai Voltaire à Dammarie-les

Constable of the RUC in the civil courts.

She did not suggest that she had suffered any other damage.

    Claims for damages brought by the applicant 1.     The claim for damages in relation to the period between August 1999 and October 2004 19 .

The prosecutor’s request to that effect had been wrongful and had directly caused that damage.

    A public corporation is vicariously liable in damages for injury or damage caused through error or negligence in the exercise of public authority.

    Le 19 octobre 2009, le tribunal de première instance constata que le délai de la prescription absolue s’était écoulé concernant deux des accusés et mit fin aux poursuites à leur égard.

The Court also awarded the applicant EUR 3,000 for non-pecuniary damage. (The judgment is available only in French.)

Moreover, an obligation to exhaust such an administrative law remedy that was capable only of leading to an award of damages might render illusory a Contracting State’s obligation under Articles 2 and