CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1212JUD001031904
12 décembre 2013
: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made
Page 16 sur 65
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019JUD004395511
19 octobre 2021
In the absence of either other information from the parties or the results of the domestic investigation, it is impossible to make a conclusion to the contrary. 59.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1114JUD000078821
14 novembre 2023
had made no comment on the validity or reliability of the report.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD000744007
10 novembre 2022
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0909DEC000018402
9 septembre 2004
Besides, the first applicant has never made an admission of the kind alleged by the Government.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1104JUD006312613
4 novembre 2021
The commission made a report finding that doctor K. had examined and treated the applicant’s mother properly. RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK 14.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68082-68550
22 juin 1999
brought by six Spanish nationals, Elena Riera Blume, Concepción Riera Blume, Maria Luz Casado Perez, Daria Amelia Casado Perez, Maria Teresa Sales Aige and Javier Bruna Reverter, all of whom live in Valencia
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0219JUD007268110
19 février 2019
Neither did the applicant make any submissions in that regard (see paragraph 40 above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0326JUD007694201
26 mars 2009
display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s6C2D746E { width:198.98pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION CASE OF VALENTIN
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1122DEC004197898
22 novembre 2001
:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 41978/98 by Valentin
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1112DEC002227820
12 novembre 2024
xa0; In determining whether the applicant sufficiently substantiated his various complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, the Court reiterates that the complaints an applicant proposes to make
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68355-68823
27 février 2001
Italy (no. 41811/98) (more than ten years and five months) The applicant made no just satisfaction claims. ( 17) Pettirossi v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213JUD000874115
13 décembre 2016
The Government made no objections in that regard, leaving this issue for the Court to decide. 32.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0904DEC007502501
4 septembre 2003
, made in their favour against a State authority, enforced.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0418JUD006512819
18 avril 2023
While she was assigned male at birth, she identified as a girl from a young age; she preferred behaving and socially presenting herself in a manner society expects of girls.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1128JUD003012921
28 novembre 2023
As a result, the applicant had practically no time to study the given evidence and make submissions in reply. At the same time, the Civil Court of Appeal did not remedy this shortcoming.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0124JUD000062313
24 janvier 2023
From the first days when the infected wound was reported, the prison authorities were made aware in substance of those aspects (see paragraph 3 in fine above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0112JUD000728616
12 janvier 2023
Conversely, they made no specific complaint about the warrant’s implementation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0903DEC006014800
3 septembre 2002
the exclusion of the child undesirable and suitable arrangements have been made for the child’s care.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628DEC002157805
28 juin 2011
OTHER COMPLAINTS Some applicants made accessory complaints referring to assorted Articles of the Convention.