CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 285 résultats pour « Valentin MACE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1212JUD001031904

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2013

12 décembre 2013

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

Page 16 sur 65

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019JUD004395511

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2021

19 octobre 2021

In the absence of either other information from the parties or the results of the domestic investigation, it is impossible to make a conclusion to the contrary. 59.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1114JUD000078821

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2023

14 novembre 2023

had made no comment on the validity or reliability of the report.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD000744007

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2022

10 novembre 2022

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0909DEC000018402

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2004

9 septembre 2004

Besides, the first applicant has never made an admission of the kind alleged by the Government.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1104JUD006312613

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2021

4 novembre 2021

The commission made a report finding that doctor K. had examined and treated the applicant’s mother properly. RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK 14.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68082-68550

Admin. suprême

22 juin 1999

22 juin 1999

brought by six Spanish nationals, Elena Riera Blume, Concepción Riera Blume, Maria Luz Casado Perez, Daria Amelia Casado Perez, Maria Teresa Sales Aige and Javier Bruna Reverter, all of whom live in Valencia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0219JUD007268110

Admin. suprême

19 février 2019

19 février 2019

Neither did the applicant make any submissions in that regard (see paragraph 40 above).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0326JUD007694201

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2009

26 mars 2009

display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s6C2D746E { width:198.98pt; display:inline-block }       FIFTH SECTION         CASE OF VALENTIN

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1122DEC004197898

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2001

22 novembre 2001

:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 41978/98 by Valentin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1112DEC002227820

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2024

12 novembre 2024

xa0;   In determining whether the applicant sufficiently substantiated his various complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, the Court reiterates that the complaints an applicant proposes to make

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68355-68823

Admin. suprême

27 février 2001

27 février 2001

Italy (no. 41811/98) (more than ten years and five months) The applicant made no just satisfaction claims. ( 17)     Pettirossi v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213JUD000874115

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2016

13 décembre 2016

    The Government made no objections in that regard, leaving this issue for the Court to decide. 32.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0904DEC007502501

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2003

4 septembre 2003

, made in their favour against a State authority, enforced.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0418JUD006512819

Admin. suprême

18 avril 2023

18 avril 2023

While she was assigned male at birth, she identified as a girl from a young age; she preferred behaving and socially presenting herself in a manner society expects of girls.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1128JUD003012921

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2023

28 novembre 2023

As a result, the applicant had practically no time to study the given evidence and make submissions in reply. At the same time, the Civil Court of Appeal did not remedy this shortcoming.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0124JUD000062313

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2023

24 janvier 2023

From the first days when the infected wound was reported, the prison authorities were made aware in substance of those aspects (see paragraph 3 in fine above).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0112JUD000728616

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2023

12 janvier 2023

Conversely, they made no specific complaint about the warrant’s implementation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0903DEC006014800

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2002

3 septembre 2002

the exclusion of the child undesirable and suitable arrangements have been made for the child’s care.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628DEC002157805

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2011

28 juin 2011

    OTHER COMPLAINTS Some applicants made accessory complaints referring to assorted Articles of the Convention.

Source officielle