From the first interview with her mother-in-law in 2010 the police learned that the applicant resided in the United States; however, the United States refused to disclose her address due to the data protection

The domestic courts’ finding that the applicant had threatened the State with terrorist acts had thus been arbitrary.

By section 3(2), the Act had to be applied while respecting the rights of the persons affected and avoiding “any risk of unfairness”.

  Bembič, State Attorney-General. 3.

what periods?

After a while they had requested that the second applicant signed some papers.

    The Court reiterates that a judgment in which it finds a breach of the Convention imposes on the respondent State a legal obligation to put an end to the breach and make reparation for its

To what extent it does so will depend upon the circumstances of the particular case.

What confessions and/or statements ( явка с повинной; показания ) did the applicant give during that period (please submit relevant documents, in particular, written, audio or video records containing

The applicant’s statements remained unchanged during the pre-trial investigation and trial. She did not confess to the crime in question at any stage of the proceedings.

The next hearing took place on 17 September 2020, while the hearing scheduled for 23   November 2020 was adjourned upon a request of the defendant’s representative, due to quarantine, and the hearing

After the applicant stepped out of the car, while he remained surrounded by the team of the SOD officers, he was immediately searched.

COMPLAINTS The applicants complain that they were ill-treated while in police custody and that there was no effective official investigation into their ill-treatment.

What matters is the scope and nature of the decisions taken by the judge before deciding on the charges against the applicant.

, four times a year, under supervision, while A was not granted any contact rights. 8.

In this respect, he states that there had been no suspicion for his arrest and that he was not informed of the reasons of his arrest or of any charges against him.

The damages granted to them under settlements in court are substantial sums and, although it is not possible in any settlement to say what part was paid with a view to what claim, it may be presumed that

She also alleged that no other person in a similar position had ever had to pay tax in respect of property purchased from the State for a purely symbolic price. 8 .

vertical-align:top }   Published on 7 June 2021   SECOND SECTION Application no. 44281/18 Sebahat YARAŞIR and Others against Turkey lodged on 4 September 2018 communicated on 20 May 2021 STATEMENT