examination/attendance of witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based   45167/22 05/09/2022 Sergey Alekseyevich SHISHKOV

Shishkov , Ms   D. Mikhalina ,   Advisers ; (b)     for the applicant Ms   A. Demeneva ,   Counsel , Mr   B. Petranov , Ms   V. Vandova ,   Advisers .

considered his detention mandatory, which makes this complaint similar to those in previous cases against Bulgaria where violations were found (see, for example, Ilijkov , cited above, §§ 67-87 and Shishkov

access to potable water, poor quality of food Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 12,500   7653/20 12/02/2020 Oleg Gennadyevich SHIROKOV

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings     3,500   55575/21 20/10/2021 Islam Eldarovich SHAIPOV

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no.

He also complains of routine handcuffing in IK-5, Vologda Region since 20/10/1994 (Shlykov and Others v. Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3   others, §§ 77-93, 19 January 2021).

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no.

Krasnoyarsk 19/08/2019   7,500   20432/19 02/04/2019 Aleksandr Vadimovich SOBOL 1975 Meshchanskiy District Court of Moscow 02/10/2018   7,500   22698/19 03/04/2019 Daniil Sergeyevich SHUBKOV

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no. 38822/97, §   66, ECHR 2003-I (extracts)).

for toilet, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding; van on 10/06/2021: 7 hours’ transfer, no or restricted access to toilet 12,500   60606/19 12/11/2019 Vasiliy Viktorovich KARPOV 1989 Shirokov

tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Stavropol Regional Court, 28/04/2021 4,000   35153/21 25/06/2021 Ivan Anatolyevich SHIPKOV

trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the court failed to call the policemen that drew up an administrative offence record   35153/21* 25/06/2021 Ivan Anatolyevich SHIPKOV

toilet, lack or inadequate furniture, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food, passive smoking, no or restricted access to shower   43092/18 28/08/2018 Ruslan Valeryevich SHIPKOV

Bulgaria (no. 38884/97, § 97, 30   January   2003) and Shishkov v.

Justification for any period of detention, no matter how short, must be convincingly demonstrated by the authorities (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria , no. 38822/97, § 66, ECHR 2003-I (extracts)). 45.

according to its case-law, Article 5 § 4 enshrines, as does Article 6 § 1, the right of access to a court, which can only be subject to reasonable limitations that do not impair its very essence (see Shishkov

  Oleksandr Shumkov iii.   Roman Ternovskyy j)   L’affaire du prétendu «   criminel de guerre   » – Serhiy Lytvynov i.

Russia 2 August 1983 Uzbekistan   App. no. 79223/17 22 November 2017   Timofey SHIROKOV   Detention pending extradition   11 November 2015 – arrested and subsequently detained 16 March