On an unspecified date, T.A. lodged a civil defamation claim against both applicants with the Sabail District Court, arguing that the articles contained false factual information accusing

    In both cases the applicant was brought before the Sabail District Court on the day of his arrest, 17 November 2012 and 26 January 2013 respectively. 14.

42347/08 Vagif Aliyev Occupancy voucher of 28 October 1996 The Sumgayit Court of Appeal’s judgment of 24 December 2008 11 August 2008 454/09 Bakhtiyar Muslumov Ownership certificate of 5 April 1995 The Sabayil

    By a notification dated 12 April 2012, sent by the Sabail District Executive Authority (“the SDEA”), the applicants were informed that: (i) the properties in question were to be expropriated

Decision of the Sabail District Court of 7 April 2012 convicting the applicant under Article 310.1 of the CAO to fifteen days’ administrative detention.

    On 17 January 2007 the Sabail District Court ordered the applicant’s pre-trial detention. 7.

On 29 May 2007 the Sabail District Court dismissed the applicant’s claim, finding that the applicant had failed to prove that he had been deliberately placed in a cell with ill inmates and had contracted

The applicant challenged that decision before the Sabail District Court, arguing that he had been unlawfully detained for six days at the OCU, that no cross-examination with the police officers had been

authorise the demonstrations at the places indicated by the organisers and proposed a different location on the outskirts of Baku – the yard of a driving school situated in the 20 th habitable area of the Sabail

    On an unspecified date the applicant lodged a claim against the Committee with the Sabail District Court, asking the court to order the return of the unlawfully seized religious literature

    On 4 May 2007 the Sabayil District Court found the first applicant guilty under Article 283.1 of the Criminal Code (incitement to ethnic, racial, social or religious hatred and hostility,

    On 31 March 2006 the Sabayil District Court dismissed the applicant’s claim, finding that she had failed to prove her allegations, in particular that she had been beaten or had otherwise

    On 4 May 2007 the Sabayil District Court found Rafig Tagiyev guilty under Article 283.1 (incitement to ethnic, racial, social or religious hatred and hostility, committed publicly or by use

    On 7 July 2014 the Sabail District Court ordered freezing of the applicant’s and the Association’s bank accounts. 20.

    On 24 July 2017 the Sabail District Court found the applicant guilty under Articles 213.1 and 283.2.2 of the Criminal Code and sentenced him to three years and three months’ imprisonment.

    As regards the applicant in application no. 66650/13, by a decision dated 1 April 2013, a judge at the Sabail District Court dismissed his complaint after examining it on the merits.

All those trials were conducted by either the Assize Court or the Sabail District Court and were completed in March and April 2004.

    On 29 May 2007 the Sabail District Court dismissed the applicant’s claim, finding that the applicant had failed to prove that he had been deliberately placed in a cell with inmates who were

    By a judgment of 13 February 2013 the Sabail District Court, referring to Article 47 of the Constitution, Article 23 of the Civil Code, the decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of