According to the accused [the applicant] those injuries were inflicted on him at around 5 p.m. on 4 March 2011 at the Nizami district police office in Ganja and at around 10 a.m. on 5 March 2011 at the

    On 16 March 2002 the investigator decided that the applicant was to be detained in the ITT until 19 March 2002, on account of the considerable number of investigative measures yet to be taken

    On 7 June 2005 the Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Leninsky Court of 14 March 2005, finding, as was subsequently confirmed by the Supreme Court, that the bailiffs had failed to

Criminal Code, which came into force on 1 March 1994.

On the basis of those findings, on 7 December 1998 the applicant was prohibited from teaching at the school.

In March 2017 the Commission found that part of the statement had amounted to discriminatory harassment and to incitement to discrimination, fined Mr Simeonov 1,000 Bulgarian levs (equivalent to 511 euros

In March 1990 the applicant was elected to the Supreme Council of the Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic (“SSR”).

    Between 3 March 2000 and 21 March 2001, the Ankara Civil Court collected further evidence in the case. 19.

Turkey , nos. 21392/08 and 2 others, §§ 142-52; see also Filkin v. Portugal , no. 69729/12, 3 March 2020)?

At the time of the Constitutional Court's finding the relevant period had lasted 12 years and 10 months.

On 18 March 2011 that court allowed his claim and awarded him compensation in the amount of PLN 500.

On 4 March 1999 the Volyn Regional Court quashed this decision and remitted the case for a fresh consideration.

In March 2017 the applicant applied for a residence permit for the purpose of exercising family life with his sisters in the Netherlands.

She contested the diagnosis given by the hospital psychiatrists and their findings as to the necessity of her confinement.

  On the latter date the applicant requested a   further expert opinion which was submitted on 28 March 1980.     20.

    On 31 January 2015 the police issued a penalty notice finding the applicant guilty of the minor offence of not reporting his new address of residence and fining him 500 Croatian kunas (HRK

  Romania , no. 54153/08, § 97, 25 March 2014)?

On 17 March 2011 the Baku Court of Appeal upheld the first-instance court’s decision.

    On 17 March 2011 the Sabail District Court refused to admit the complaint, finding that the applicant’s lawyer had failed to join his power of attorney to the application. 48.