June 1992 the Court:   -     dismissed unanimously the government's preliminary      objection that the applicant was not a victim;   -     held

  Summary of the facts   The applicant claims he became the target of bullying and that, towards the end of November 1992, he was hit on the side of the head, causing him to fall and strike his

He also complains under Article   8 of the recording of tape-conversations he held with R.

It held inter alia that according to the medical expert report produced by the Mina Minovici Forensic Institute the applicant needed replacement of lost bone tissue surgery after an operated head injury

Seyit Külekçi had received eight bullets to his head, shoulders, arms, chest, abdomen and lumbar region. Both of his ears had been cut off.

He was hospitalised the same day, and a medical report, noting bruising, swelling and a cut of 4   cm, confirmed that he had a serious head injury.

He alleged in particular that he had not had a fair hearing in proceedings relating to the granting of a social benefit for forced labour he had been required to provide during his military service.

While the applicant held the position of head of administration for all kindergartens in Slavonski Brod, Z.B. sought and obtained employment in one of the kindergartens in Slavonski Brod as a teacher.

Beschikking van de president van de eerste kamer van het Hof van 22 juni 1987.#Mareile Aldinger, echtgenote Th. Tziovas tegen Europees Parlement.

Arrest van het Hof (Zesde kamer) van 22 maart 1990.#Openbaar Ministerie en Minister van Financïen tegen Vincent Houben.#Verzoek om een prejudiciële beslissing: Hof van Beroep te Antwerpen - België.

Arrest van het Hof (Zesde kamer) van 30 maart 1993.#Christos Konstantinidis tegen Stadt Altensteig - Standesamt en Landratsamt Calw - Ordnungsamt.

Arrest van het Hof (Eerste kamer) van 11 mei 1993.#H.J.J. van Doesselaar tegen Minister van Verkeer en Waterstaat.

In 1989 the applicant, who worked as head of a department in a state-owned enterprise dealing with conservation of old buildings, was dismissed.

  The applicant’s head was shaved and he was placed in solitary confinement until March 17.

On 19 January 1989 another hearing was held. 11.

father had committed the acts he stood accused of, the child had said he had not.

  Finding that the period to be taken into consideration had lasted more than two years and nine months, he Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the

In each case the head of the Civil Status Office issued a notice refusing to accept their declarations, relying on the domestic law, which defined marriage only as a union between a man and a woman.