CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

24 730 résultats pour « Farissy »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1207JUD006319016

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2017

7 décembre 2017

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)

Page 16 sur 1237

← PrécédentSuivant →
Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0304JUD005495321

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2025

4 mars 2025

Furthermore, he could only file his requests for leave once he had learned about the death of his family members. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1019JUD000832418

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2023

19 octobre 2023

under Article 8 of the Convention that the domestic authorities had failed to make sufficient efforts to enforce the contact arrangement in respect of his son, in breach of his right to respect for his family

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0416JUD000124021

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2024

16 avril 2024

    The relevant principles concerning interference with the right to respect for family life are summarised in Strand Lobben and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0912JUD000554122

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2024

12 septembre 2024

xa0;   On 6 March 2020 the court made an interim order for regular contact between the applicant and his son for the period from March to June 2020 at the premises of the Centre for children and family

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612JUD002303815

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2018

12 juin 2018

family.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD001208320

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2023

13 juin 2023

The family lived in Italy. Court proceedings in Italy 3.     In 2016 their relationship ended and Ms M. sought exclusive custody of the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0123JUD003787021

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2025

23 janvier 2025

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0831JUD005666918

Admin. suprême

31 août 2023

31 août 2023

The Court has already held that Article   8 requires the authorities to take all the measures that could reasonably be expected of them to enable the parent and the child to maintain and develop family

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD005105621

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2023

13 juin 2023

Their son, L., was born in December 2014 in the United Kingdom, where the family lived until their relocation to Switzerland in 2017. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1026JUD003266220

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2023

26 octobre 2023

In January 2017, after a family holiday with the children in a third country, the applicant returned to their home in Ibiza alone.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1128JUD003012921

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2023

28 novembre 2023

    In November 2017 the family moved to Germany. 5 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD001249821

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2024

11 avril 2024

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0416JUD001077221

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2024

16 avril 2024

    Since the summer of 2013 the family had travelled on several occasions between Portugal and Romania.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0208JUD001086219

Admin. suprême

8 février 2024

8 février 2024

Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Faris Vehabović , President ,   Anja Seibert-Fohr,   Anne Louise Bormann , judges , and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0917JUD005223220

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2024

17 septembre 2024

As she was the main financial provider for the family, the first applicant’s removal would not deprive the family of its main source of income. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0428JUD001854920

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2022

28 avril 2022

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0704JUD001985710

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2023

4 juillet 2023

    The Court is lastly mindful of the fact that the domestic authorities’ task was made difficult by the strained relationship within the family.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0912JUD003976917

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2023

12 septembre 2023

be reunited, and (ii)   insufficient regard was paid to the positive duty to take measures to preserve family bonds to the extent reasonably feasible (compare also Strand Lobben and Others , cited

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0928JUD000406521

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2023

28 septembre 2023

    Upon appeal by the applicant, on 17 September 2019 the Kraków Regional Court obliged M.M. and the applicant to undergo regular family therapy at the Specialised Family Counselling Centre

Source officielle