CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1207JUD006319016
7 décembre 2017
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
Page 16 sur 1237
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0304JUD005495321
4 mars 2025
Furthermore, he could only file his requests for leave once he had learned about the death of his family members. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1019JUD000832418
19 octobre 2023
under Article 8 of the Convention that the domestic authorities had failed to make sufficient efforts to enforce the contact arrangement in respect of his son, in breach of his right to respect for his family
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0416JUD000124021
16 avril 2024
The relevant principles concerning interference with the right to respect for family life are summarised in Strand Lobben and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0912JUD000554122
12 septembre 2024
xa0; On 6 March 2020 the court made an interim order for regular contact between the applicant and his son for the period from March to June 2020 at the premises of the Centre for children and family
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612JUD002303815
12 juin 2018
family.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD001208320
13 juin 2023
The family lived in Italy. Court proceedings in Italy 3. In 2016 their relationship ended and Ms M. sought exclusive custody of the child.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0123JUD003787021
23 janvier 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0831JUD005666918
31 août 2023
The Court has already held that Article 8 requires the authorities to take all the measures that could reasonably be expected of them to enable the parent and the child to maintain and develop family
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD005105621
Their son, L., was born in December 2014 in the United Kingdom, where the family lived until their relocation to Switzerland in 2017. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1026JUD003266220
26 octobre 2023
In January 2017, after a family holiday with the children in a third country, the applicant returned to their home in Ibiza alone.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1128JUD003012921
28 novembre 2023
In November 2017 the family moved to Germany. 5 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD001249821
11 avril 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0416JUD001077221
Since the summer of 2013 the family had travelled on several occasions between Portugal and Romania.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0208JUD001086219
8 février 2024
Romania, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Faris Vehabović , President , Anja Seibert-Fohr, Anne Louise Bormann , judges , and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0917JUD005223220
17 septembre 2024
As she was the main financial provider for the family, the first applicant’s removal would not deprive the family of its main source of income. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0428JUD001854920
28 avril 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0704JUD001985710
4 juillet 2023
The Court is lastly mindful of the fact that the domestic authorities’ task was made difficult by the strained relationship within the family.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0912JUD003976917
12 septembre 2023
be reunited, and (ii) insufficient regard was paid to the positive duty to take measures to preserve family bonds to the extent reasonably feasible (compare also Strand Lobben and Others , cited
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0928JUD000406521
28 septembre 2023
Upon appeal by the applicant, on 17 September 2019 the Kraków Regional Court obliged M.M. and the applicant to undergo regular family therapy at the Specialised Family Counselling Centre