Whilst the applicant reiterated his allegations of ill ‑ treatment (see paragraph 9 above), the law-enforcement agents denied them. 28.

above application lodged on 29 November 2012, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides

    The applicant denied the charges and appealed against the County Court’s judgment.

Where an investigating judge decides not to grant a request for an expert report, he shall make an order stating his reasons.

She submitted that during that visit she was told that the scan gave rise to a suspicion of either Edwards or Turner syndrome. [2] 17.

    Furthermore, the Government observed that the need to protect the public interest may justify withholding certain evidence from the defence in criminal proceedings ( Edwards and Lewis v.

For this reason it considers it appropriate to examine the applicant's complaint under the two provisions taken together (see, Edwards v. the United Kingdom , 16 December 1992, § 33, Series A no. 247 &

Therefore, the applicants’ claim for damages lodged against the State bodies had been devoid of any prospect of success from the very beginning.

  In June 1980 he was interviewed by a BSS agent, Mr D., and although he initially denied his communist past he admitted his background.

  45138/98;     Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 49 of the Rules of Court;     Having deliberated;     Decides as follows: THE FACTS   The applicant

He denied the charges concerning boys A, C and D. He stated that C and D had come to his house regularly.

    The applicant disagreed with the Government and stated that she was denied a fair trial in the proceedings on account of the expedited procedure under the Decree which resulted in her being

It is for you to decide whether it is fair to do so.

Elens-Passos , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 30 March 2004, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Mr Raymond Betson (“the first

  All accused denied having been involved in drugs and none of them gave evidence before the jury.   They claimed that they had been falsely implicated in the offences.

Belgium , 30 July 1998, § 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 ‑ V; and Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom , no. 46477/99, Commission decision of 7 June 2001). 44.

    In the spring of 1996 Mr Örn Clausen, husband of Mrs Justice Guðrún Erlendsdóttir, had sought a solution to certain financial problems arising from the inability of a debtor, Mr Edvard Lövdal

N. changed his previous statement and now denied that the applicant had sold drugs to him.

Under section 10(1) of the Act, only wiretapping and surveillance techniques using stationary devices required a court order. III.     RELEVANT INTERNATIONAL LAW 35.