paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention, with regard to the excessive length of civil as well as criminal proceedings and that Austria has been sentenced on several occasions to the payment of high damages

Law – Article 6 § 1: Under the Court’s constant jurisprudence, the legislature was not prevented from regulating rights derived from the laws in force through new retrospective provisions.

He further claimed that her conduct amounted to “insolent fraud or severe negligence”; that he was subjected to “constant pressure, racket and blackmail”; and that she had participated in preparing false

Souzig substituant Me DAMMANN, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : J 002 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : L'affaire a été débattue le 13 Septembre 2006, en audience publique, devant la Cour composée de :

    Damage 62.

In addition, the applicant company claimed EUR 250,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 54.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société anonyme Go Sport sis zone industrielle de la Justice, à Dammarie-les-Lys

  In 1969 part of the ramparts collapsed, with the risk of damage being caused to property situated below.

In addition he claimed ATS 2 million in respect of non-pecuniary damage. The second applicant requested the Court to award him an appropriate amount for non-pecuniary damage.

Damage 24.     The applicant claimed 2,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 25.

A civil compensation claim lodged on behalf of the applicant seeking non-pecuniary damages from the State for the sexual abuse suffered by her was unsuccessful.

UAH from S.P. and 90,000 UAH from the hospital in moral damages for her unjustified confinement.

    The applicant claimed an overall amount of 850,000 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses. 37.

and food allowance respectively and an additional indexation payment of RUB   1,652.35 for health damage.

    Damage 1.     Pecuniary damage 27.

proceedings in damages he had brought in this connection.

    In September 2005 the applicant’s trial started before the Constanţa County Court. 7.

    Damage 94.

The second applicant further claimed damages totalling FIM 1,500,000 and expenses.