CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
civ1
613722a0cd580146773ff503
13 mars 1996
correspondance de 1985, précédant la conclusion du contrat, manifesté leur accord de ne pas couvrir le risque de responsabilité civile pour dommages corporels pouvant survenir aux personnes se trouvant à bord
Page 16 sur 577
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:C100657
15 octobre 2025
"Afin d'obtenir la certification du RINA, des modules de formation spécifiques pour les équipages ont été créés dans le strict respect des nouveaux protocoles sanitaires et du système de gestion de bord
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC004592099
23 février 1999
Following the applicant’s appeal, the Aliens Appeals Board, on 23 April 1997, quashed the Immigration Board’s decision and referred the case back for re-examination.
CHAMBRE 2 SECTION 2
61625c96d64a6b1f51487730
13 février 2014
Dans ses conclusions déposées le 2 décembre 2013, la SA BOCCARD demande à la Cour : 1- Statuant dans les rapports entre les sociétés BOCCARD, DUFOUR et AXA BELGIUM : - d'infirmer le jugement en ce
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009DEC001502905
9 octobre 2007
On 16 May 1996 Ms I.P. and six other students complained to the Competition Board that the applicant’s advertisements had been misleading. On 17 October 1996 the Board found for them.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226535
19 novembre 2009
Proceedings before the Immigration Appeals Board On 18 December 2008 the Immigration Appeals Board rejected the applicant’s appeal.
CASELAW;STATEMENTOFFACTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2940823-3234847
7 décembre 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120DEC002125204
20 janvier 2009
The employer’s managing board (“the board”), by a decision of 19 March 1999, rejected the applicant’s objection of 18 March 1999 as out of time.
cr
613725eacd58014677421833
10 janvier 2001
est gérant, a fait ériger un panneau publicitaire portant la mention "docteur Knock supermarché vert" au droit du PR 34 et 480 de la rocade A 630 sens intérieur de la commune de Bègles, à 20 mètres du bord
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1210JUD001537916
10 décembre 2021
In the Board’s view, assistance measures as an alternative to taking X into care had to be deemed inexpedient in terms of protecting him from further neglect, as the Board found it established that the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1129DEC002642706
29 novembre 2011
to the Medical Responsibility Board ( Hälso- och sjukvårdens ansvarsnämnd – hereafter “the Board”) and requested that his medical licence should be revoked or, in the alternative, that he should be subjected
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1125JUD001428288
25 novembre 1993
The Licensing Board’s function in relation to the applicants’ request was simply to assess whether the activity in respect of which VAFAB had sought the Board’s authorisation would entail a significant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0125DEC002726295
25 janvier 2001
The Board had omitted any reference to those visits. Contrary to the Board’s view the children had been developing well in the children’s home.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1010DEC002075592
10 octobre 1994
(b) Parole Board The Parole Board is now established under section 18 of the 1989 Act.
soc
61372514cd5801467741ad1b
7 juin 2007
X... exerçant les fonctions de chef de bord à la SNCF a été muté à un poste en gare en raison de la suspension, par décision du 8 novembre 2004, de son habilitation sécurité pendant la période où il a
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0515JUD003732613
15 mai 2018
The Board’s decision was not revoked and an invitation to the Chairperson to attend a rehearsal (as members of the Board sometimes did in connection with other performances) remained unanswered
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0622DEC005957800
22 juin 2004
On 10 February 1998 the Insurance Court upheld the Accident Board’s decision, giving the following reasons: “The reasons mentioned in the Accident Board’s decision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0123DEC003215696
23 janvier 1997
In August 1994 Mrs AG appealed to the Aliens Appeals Board (Utlänningsnämnden), requesting that her case be sent back to the National Immigration Board for new consideration
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1129DEC002570905
29 novembre 2007
Ms Abdulqadir and the children appealed to the Aliens Appeals Board ( Utlänningsnämnden ).
ECLI:CEDH:001-121879
27 mai 2013
The Bellevue area is considered to be a cultural heritage of national interest and has been recognised as such by the National Heritage Board ( Riksantikvarieämbetet ).