Mr K. was absent because of a business trip. 24 .     On 26 February 2002 a hearing was postponed because of the applicant's illness. 25 .

On 23 July 2012 the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court stated that the complaint was not subject to examination by the courts dealing with administrative procedure because it involved the examination

  Law : The Government’s request for the application to be struck out of the list because the owner of the building in dispute had died : (a)     Allowed in respect of the owner’s son: At

  (g) Is the fairness of the criminal proceedings against C.O. seriously called into question because of the impugned statements?   2.

Vu : - la désignation d'office de Me Bechaux ; - les autres pièces du dossier.

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 25 mai 2022, Mme C A, représentée par Me Bechaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 23 février 2022 par lequel la préfète de

The applicants rejected this offer, mainly because they did not wish to change the neighbourhood and because the new flat was, in their view, of a worse quality.

On 2   March 1995 the hearing was again adjourned because of the absence of the applicant’s counsel.

The court added that the invoices could be not considered false because they had been issued for services which had really been provided.

  In his request he explained how he wished to cease production at Ötz because it was situated some 100 kilometres from Mäder, he was unable to run both sites himself and because the tenant who had

On 10   April 2000 the district court adjourned the execution because the agency had complained about the bailiff.

It took into consideration that the law on concurrence of criminal offences applied because of other offences the applicant had been convicted of after 2013 and it reduced the sentence by a year because

It was rejected on 1   December 2020 because she had failed to substantiate any objective risk for her or for the child.

C, G et A ainsi que Mme A, représentés par Me Béchaud, demandent à la cour : 1°) d'annuler cette ordonnance du président de la 1ère chambre du tribunal administratif de Bordeaux du 30 mars 2020 : 2

BERNAUD BATIMENT 26 prise en la personne de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 7] [Localité 5] représentée par Me Thierry CHAUVIN, avocat au barreau de VALENCE

RAMILLON, avoué à la Cour COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : LORS DU DELIBERE : Madame Christiane BEROUJON, Conseiller faisant fonction de Président, Monsieur Jean-Pierre VIGNAL, Conseiller, Monsieur Jean-Louis BERNAUD

audit siège [Adresse 8] [Localité 5] défaillante COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : LORS DES DEBATS ET DU DELIBERE : Monsieur Daniel MULLER, Président de Chambre, Monsieur Jean-Louis BERNAUD

avoué à la Cour COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : LORS DU DELIBERE : Madame Christiane BEROUJON, Conseiller faisant fonction de Président, Monsieur Jean- Pierre VIGNAL, Conseiller, Monsieur Jean- Louis BERNAUD