The Court therefore decides to join these issues to the merits. 57.

The criminal investigation was suspended on 18   December 2006 for lack of a suspect.

If a residence permit cannot be granted under this criteria, the Migration Board may instead decide to re-examine the matter.

Il décéda le 12 novembre 1980.

  8976/07, §§   45 and 46, 18   December   2018 [Committee]). 11.

    The court established that in December 2004 some unknown persons had hired K. to murder Mr Bandura.

    On 2 December 1971, the applicants’ predecessor in title rented (under title of temporary emphyteusis) the property to a third party, for seventeen years. 7.

Comme le permet l’article 29 §   1 de la Convention, il a en outre été décidé que la chambre se prononcerait en même temps sur la recevabilité et le fond. EN FAIT 5.

    On 24   December 2003 the investigator commissioned a new forensic medical expert report. 30.

Turkey , no. 18907/02, § 48, 15   December 2009). 39.

On 12 December 2008 F. proposed that no investigation be initiated.

    Transporté dans un hôpital après l’accident, T. y décéda le 16   décembre 2006. 8 .

, in principle, be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey

submitted by the respondent Government on 1 February 2012, requesting the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases and the applicant’s reply to that declaration, Having deliberated, decides

    A l’audience du 12 juillet 2001, la cour d’assises décida de demander l’issue de la saisine de la Cour constitutionnelle. 63.

On 1 December 1994 the Ovacık Public Prosecutor issued a decision of non-jurisdiction ratione loci and sent the investigation file to the Hozat   Public Prosecutor’s office.

    In December 2015 the defendants were released and placed under house arrest, which was later lifted. 11.

  Slovakia , no. 74832/01, § 89, 14 December 2010). In assessing evidence, the Court adopts the standard of proof “beyond reasonable doubt”.

The Court reiterates in this connection that the procedural obligation under Article 2 of the Convention is not an obligation of result but of means only (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v.