However, the applicant was unable to enforce that judgment because company A. had no assets.

because the victims did not attend, and one was adjourned because it was necessary to serve the applicant with a copy of the indictment act in the Tyvan language. 22 .

He submitted that a report was not feasible because he had not been given the opportunity to examine F. thoroughly by F.’s mother. 18.

The Austrian newspapers reported on these events because U.W. kept them regularly informed and sought publicity. 13.

This meant that the applicant company’s action had to be dismissed because it had been brought in respect of an inexistent item of property. 17.

On 25 October 2001 the public-State commission was disbanded because the case had gone on trial. 7.     Judicial proceedings against Mr B.

Several detainees smoked in the communal areas, the cells and the dormitories, and the non-smokers, especially those with respiratory problems, became passive smokers. 28.

2013 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

It was precisely because of the legislator’s intervention that those proceedings were stayed and section 180 of the Obligations Act repealed ...

Rustam Kagirov had been classed as category 1 disabled because he suffered from tuberculosis and had had his left lung removed. 4.

Because of the pending court proceedings, P.I. did not want to pose officially next to his new love. 7.

    On 19 September 2017 Mr Shapkin and his representative requested revision of the judgment of 15 March 2016 because of the non-allocation of sums under Article 41 of the Convention. 7.

The amendment had therefore been necessary and proportionate because it had aimed at equalising the situation of all churches in Poland.

RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS COUR D'APPEL DE METZ ORDONNANCE DU 04 JANVIER 2026 1ère prolongation Nous, Olivier BEAUDIER, Président de chambre, agissant sur délégation de Monsieur

Romania (no. 70787/01) The applicant, Ion Răducu, was a Romanian national who was born in 1939 and lived in Alexandria (Romania).

    The applicant, Mr Alexander Sokolov, is a Russian national, who was born in 1960 and lives in Voronezh, Russian Federation. He was represented before the Court by Mr E.

Application no. 1153/10 by Alexandru and Tamara Băluţă 12.     The first applicant, Mr Alexandru Băluţă, is a Moldovan national who was born in 1984 and lives in Lunga.

applications at stake, the Court finds that the requirement imposed by Article 1   ter paragraph   1 of the Pinto Act can be considered to be in compliance with Article   13 firstly because

He had not been opposed to receiving such protection because several other persons had been “provoking” him as well.