CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 285 résultats pour « Valentin MACE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC001657215

Admin. suprême

30 août 2016

30 août 2016

Nevertheless, the law shall make suitable provision for Turkish citizens resident abroad to be able to exercise their right to vote.

Page 15 sur 65

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC001657615

Admin. suprême

30 août 2016

30 août 2016

Nevertheless, the law shall make suitable provision for Turkish citizens resident abroad to be able to exercise their right to vote.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0302JUD001979616

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2023

2 mars 2023

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923DEC008170817

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2025

23 septembre 2025

Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 23   September 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Faris Vehabović , President ,   Lorraine Schembri Orland,   Sebastian Răduleţu , judges , and Valentin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913DEC003396915

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2016

13 septembre 2016

Nevertheless, the law shall make suitable provision for Turkish citizens resident abroad to be able to exercise their right to vote.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD002028521

Admin. suprême

27 octobre 2022

27 octobre 2022

above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the applicant and that there is no need to examine these complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219630

Admin. suprême

8 septembre 2022

8 septembre 2022

    In July 2010 the bank and the applicant made an annexe amending the loan.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1216JUD008272417

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2021

16 décembre 2021

It thus considers that this complaint is admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on it (see   Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of   Valentin   Câmpeanu v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0911DEC003552609

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2012

11 septembre 2012

    The applicants relied on their submissions made upon lodging their applications with the Court.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1180569-1231906

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2004

9 novembre 2004

Spain (no. 77837/01)   Violation of Article 6 § 1 The applicant, Ricardo Saez Maeso, is a Spanish national who was born in 1961 and lives in Valencia (Spain).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0116JUD000315821

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2024

16 janvier 2024

It finds that, as established by the domestic court, the applicant was made to bear a disproportionate burden.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129JUD002438510

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2019

29 janvier 2019

The instructions by the supervising authorities had not been followed in full and the investigations had not been comprehensive and thorough, which had made it impossible to establish the real cause of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113703

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2012

17 septembre 2012

    Press statements made by public officials 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0324JUD002794803

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2026

24 mars 2026

Szekely, a lawyer practising in Satu Mare; the decision to give notice of the application to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, most recently Ms O.F.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605JUD007444114

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2018

5 juin 2018

  11353/06, §§ 50-61, 15 September 2015, and Valentin Baştovoi v. Republic of Moldova , no. 40614/14, §§ 13-14, 28   November 2017). 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD006589316

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2024

24 octobre 2024

The judgment made no comment on the applicant’s specific arguments concerning the connection between M.H. and the police, and his allegation that the fight had been set up in order to frame him. 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1209JUD002955014

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2025

9 décembre 2025

While the Government argued that one of the applicant’s co-tenants had let the police in (see paragraph 13 above), the domestic courts did not make any such finding.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0710JUD005409310

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2018

10 juillet 2018

In addition, the second applicant, the head of the Ankara branch of the DTP, made the following statement: “Our fears and worries continue. People are still being killed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192885

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2019

3 avril 2019

1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC4FC5D7A { height:26.85pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   Communicated on 3 April 2019   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 63126/13 Valentina

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0621JUD000961603

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2007

21 juin 2007

After the death of the applicant, his daughter, Mrs   Valentina Ivanovna Svistun, expressed her wish to pursue the application. 2.

Source officielle