CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC001657215
30 août 2016
Nevertheless, the law shall make suitable provision for Turkish citizens resident abroad to be able to exercise their right to vote.
Page 15 sur 65
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC001657615
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0302JUD001979616
2 mars 2023
: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923DEC008170817
23 septembre 2025
Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 23 September 2025 as a Committee composed of: Faris Vehabović , President , Lorraine Schembri Orland, Sebastian Răduleţu , judges , and Valentin
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913DEC003396915
13 septembre 2016
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD002028521
27 octobre 2022
above, the Court considers that it has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the applicant and that there is no need to examine these complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219630
8 septembre 2022
In July 2010 the bank and the applicant made an annexe amending the loan.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1216JUD008272417
16 décembre 2021
It thus considers that this complaint is admissible but that there is no need to give a separate ruling on it (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0911DEC003552609
11 septembre 2012
The applicants relied on their submissions made upon lodging their applications with the Court.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1180569-1231906
9 novembre 2004
Spain (no. 77837/01) Violation of Article 6 § 1 The applicant, Ricardo Saez Maeso, is a Spanish national who was born in 1961 and lives in Valencia (Spain).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0116JUD000315821
16 janvier 2024
It finds that, as established by the domestic court, the applicant was made to bear a disproportionate burden.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129JUD002438510
29 janvier 2019
The instructions by the supervising authorities had not been followed in full and the investigations had not been comprehensive and thorough, which had made it impossible to establish the real cause of
ECLI:CEDH:001-113703
17 septembre 2012
Press statements made by public officials 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0324JUD002794803
24 mars 2026
Szekely, a lawyer practising in Satu Mare; the decision to give notice of the application to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, most recently Ms O.F.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605JUD007444114
5 juin 2018
11353/06, §§ 50-61, 15 September 2015, and Valentin Baştovoi v. Republic of Moldova , no. 40614/14, §§ 13-14, 28 November 2017). 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD006589316
24 octobre 2024
The judgment made no comment on the applicant’s specific arguments concerning the connection between M.H. and the police, and his allegation that the fight had been set up in order to frame him. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1209JUD002955014
9 décembre 2025
While the Government argued that one of the applicant’s co-tenants had let the police in (see paragraph 13 above), the domestic courts did not make any such finding.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0710JUD005409310
10 juillet 2018
In addition, the second applicant, the head of the Ankara branch of the DTP, made the following statement: “Our fears and worries continue. People are still being killed.
ECLI:CEDH:001-192885
3 avril 2019
1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC4FC5D7A { height:26.85pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Communicated on 3 April 2019 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 63126/13 Valentina
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0621JUD000961603
21 juin 2007
After the death of the applicant, his daughter, Mrs Valentina Ivanovna Svistun, expressed her wish to pursue the application. 2.