CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 518 résultats pour « Thierry THAVE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0713JUD003803302

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2006

13 juillet 2006

In particular, there is no indication that it refused the complaint as being inadmissible.

Source officielle

Page 15 sur 126

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC13 résultats

Journal officiel
Dépôts des comptes

CABINET D'AVOCATS THIERRY THAVE ET ASSOCIES

SIREN 790154850Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de clermont-ferrand

09/12/2025

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

CABINET D'AVOCATS THIERRY THAVE ET ASSOCIES

SIREN 790154850Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de clermont-ferrand

04/03/2025

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

CABINET D'AVOCATS THIERRY THAVE ET ASSOCIES

SIREN 790154850Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de clermont-ferrand

04/03/2025

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

CABINET D'AVOCATS THIERRY THAVE ET ASSOCIES

SIREN 790154850Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de clermont-ferrand

24/05/2022

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

CABINET D'AVOCATS THIERRY THAVE ET ASSOCIES

SIREN 790154850Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de clermont-ferrand

24/05/2022

Voir →

CC

soc

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:SO10161

Cassation

7 février 2018

7 février 2018

. & fils, de la SCP Fabiani, Luc-Thaler et Pinatel, avocat de M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1222JUD005016599

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2005

22 décembre 2005

They submitted that the amount claimed by the applicant were excessive. 47.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD001202710

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2014

10 juillet 2014

provider that they will be paid. 67.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605JUD004389913

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2018

5 juin 2018

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 2 of the Convention under its procedural limb;   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0618JUD004893999

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2002

18 juin 2002

They should have had regard to the risk that the mountain of rubbish would one day collapse on their heads and that they would suffer damage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0924DEC001328422

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 2024

24 septembre 2024

In his view, the latter example demonstrated that it was effectively incumbent upon him to show that there had in fact been a specific leak from a specific source.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD004831110

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2014

10 juillet 2014

Mr Thiele confirmed that he did.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0516DEC000098304

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2006

16 mai 2006

(c) that he is physically or mentally incapable of conducting the proceedings or there are justifiable doubts as to his capacity to do so; (d) that he has refused or failed-   (i) properly to conduct

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002424694

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 1999

8 juillet 1999

By that I do not mean that they must accept their present status right to the bitter end.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0711DEC005446712

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2017

11 juillet 2017

The contested regulation provided that men were unfit for service in the security and law-enforcement bodies if they were smaller than 160 cm while women were considered unfit for such service if they

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0524DEC001720902

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2005

24 mai 2005

They observed that the applicant had failed to ask to be exempted from jury service.

Source officielle
CC

civ1

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:C100980

Cassation

20 novembre 2019

20 novembre 2019

, Luc-Thaler et Pinatel, avocat de Mme B..., l'avis de M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1018JUD000377911

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2018

18 octobre 2018

    The third-party intervener AMCB submitted that the Convention granted particular protection to statements that contributed to a public debate.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1671790-1751909

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2006

1 juin 2006

The Court noted that the applicants’ son was found lying on his back and not on his front, as had first been stated, which strengthened the theory that he had fallen.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1003DEC004898716

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2024

3 octobre 2024

    The Government submitted that there were five domestic remedies available to the applicant regarding his complaint under Article 6 § 1 and that he had failed to exhaust them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1026JUD005315799

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2006

26 octobre 2006

The applicant registered that flat as her main place of residence ( место прописки ). However, there is no indication that she had physically moved there. 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230948

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2024

17 janvier 2024

The applicant argued that according to legal theory and the Supreme Court’s case-law (nos.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1125DEC004412598

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 1999

25 novembre 1999

    On 2 March 1992 the military prosecutor announced that the German authorities had not yet reported anything positive and that the applicant's theory of his son possibly being in a city hospital

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0628DEC000695402

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2007

28 juin 2007

They also alleged that there had been breaches of various domestic rules: for instance, the time-limits in respect of interim decisions had not been complied with and there had been irregularities in the

Source officielle