Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177787
18 septembre 2017
18 septembre 2017
The leaflet did not mention what checks of participants’ general health would be made prior to the start of the new trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1212DEC004542499
12 décembre 2000
12 décembre 2000
officers pensions in the same amount as what they would have had in the former Yugoslavia.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923DEC006205010
23 septembre 2014
23 septembre 2014
On 21 March 2007 the Stuttgart Court of Appeal rejected the applicant’s appeal.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1363403-1427354
7 juin 2005
7 juin 2005
She had ended up signing a statement without knowing what it contained.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0531JUD004878420
31 mai 2022
31 mai 2022
The limitation period of the sentence shall be interrupted: (a) while enforcement of the sentence is suspended; (b) while other sentences are being served, where the provisions of Article 75 are applicable
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178471
9 octobre 2017
9 octobre 2017
He asked what they were doing and told them not to spread the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ doctrine in the village. He also hit them with a wooden stick.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1010DEC001275002
10 octobre 2002
10 octobre 2002
The foster parents have lived in separate houses since the start of 1999.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623DEC003271506
23 juin 2009
23 juin 2009
On 22 February 2008 the Stuttgart Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s action.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0522JUD001755003
22 mai 2008
22 mai 2008
It was added that, should the Attorney-General wish to proceed with a criminal investigation into these matters, he should start with the acts of those “who are gambling in casinos, laughing at us, while
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-156307
26 juin 2015
26 juin 2015
The applicant appealed the conviction of robbery, while the prosecution appealed the acquittal.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0330DEC000490208
30 mars 2017
30 mars 2017
Court notes that having regard to the overall length of the proceeding, the relevant complexity of the case, the applicant’s conduct and that of the authorities, including the diligence they displayed while
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0517DEC004073011
17 mai 2023
17 mai 2023
must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228791
12 octobre 2023
12 octobre 2023
Subsequently, a prosecutor refused the applicant’s request to start proceedings to defend the public interest in connection with the applicant’s claim that he should be awarded compensation on account
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0829DEC006418816
29 août 2019
29 août 2019
In particular, while it is true that the proceedings lasted for a long time, the Court notes that they concerned complex property issues between eight parties, that they were stayed for more than five
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1209DEC004658413
9 décembre 2021
9 décembre 2021
In particular, the Court notes that the applicant’s detention ended on 16 August 2011, while she only lodged her application with the Court on 24 June 2013.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1202DEC001880591
2 décembre 1991
2 décembre 1991
Thümmel, Schütze and Partner, lawyers in Stuttgart.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1202DEC001847991
2 décembre 1991
2 décembre 1991
Thümmel, Schütze and Partner, lawyers in Stuttgart.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0515JUD005239199
15 mai 2007
15 mai 2007
While running he had told Officer Dekker what the matter was. Officer Boonstra had been following at a distance of about ten metres. 69.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0705JUD001866919
5 juillet 2022
5 juillet 2022
, and were therefore allowed to be included in the statement of affairs. 6.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-156348
30 juin 2015
30 juin 2015
If so, when, and what rights was he informed about? What was the applicant’s procedural status?
Source officiellePage 15 sur 194