However, the Court notes that the length of the proceedings cannot be said to have originated in the inactivity of the administrative authorities.

, also if the       request would aim at the hearing of these witnesses in disguise,       since recognition of the witnesses at the public hearing cannot

inline-block } .s8EFC8F8 { width:32.36pt; display:inline-block } .sFBBFC6C9 { width:290.51pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DRAFT DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 32725/96 by Stefan

partial         implementation of norms by the District Court in favour of the         municipality, as it is performed by one Stefan

She had later reported her passport as having been stolen in Sweden.

13] (SCP BBLM Avocats) - Mutuelle CYBELE SOLIDARITE DÉBATS : A l'audience Publique du 01 Février 2024 COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL : Président : SPATERI Thomas, Vice-Président Assesseur : JOUBERT Stéfanie

According to the applicant, on 12 September 2001 the Government Guarantee Fund ( valtion vakuusrahasto, statens säkerhetsfond ) instructed the Arsenal-SSP that it could limit the enforcement proceedings

  The question of the enforcement of the deportation of the applicant was transmitted to the National Immigration Board (statens invandrarverk) on 3 November 1987.

In a medical certificate of 27 November 2001, Dr Stefan Lindbäck, chief physician at the HIV unit at Huddinge hospital and the physician responsible for the applicant’s treatment during the preceding two

These remedies cannot therefore be considered effective and adequate for the purposes of Article 26 (Art. 26) in respect of the complaints at issue (cf. Eur. Court H.R., A. v.

A decision delivered on an appeal in the interests of the law cannot alter the outcome of cases already decided. COMPLAINTS 10.

Where categories of owners are excluded in this way, their claims for restitution cannot provide the basis for a ‘legitimate expectation’ attracting the protection of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

        On 11 July 1994 the National Immigration Board (Statens invandrarverk, hereinafter "the SIV") rejected the family's application for a residence permit.

  This part of the application cannot, therefore, be declared manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (Art. 27-2) of the Convention.

Thus, the Court cannot find that the applicant may be regarded as having waived his rights under Article 6 as to the opportunity to examine the witnesses against him (ibid., § 66). 42.

On 23 March 1989 the National Immigration Board ( Statens Invandrarverk ) granted the applicant a permanent residence permit in Sweden. He was also provided with a Swedish alien’s passport.

Upon request by the applicant, a forensic biologist working at the National Laboratory of Forensic Science ( Statens kriminaltekniska laboratorium ) also gave evidence, informing the court that, 3 to 5

APPLICATION No. 16704/90                                 Stefan

    The Court considers that the serious interference with the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions cannot be adequately compensated for by the simple finding of a