Shirokov Detention pending extradition 11 November 2015 – arrested and subsequently detained 16 March 2017 - released due to annulment of extradition authorisation     Detention pending expulsion

Shishov and Mr   D.R. Kevorkov respectively. The Russian Government ("the Government") were represented initially by Mr   G.

Court’s settled case ‑ law it is the date of dispatch which is the relevant date for the purposes of calculating the six-month period in Article 35 of the Convention (see by way of example Shishkov

offence, without analysis in concreto , which makes this complaint similar to those in previous cases against Bulgaria where violations were found (see, for example, Ilijkov , cited above, §§ 67-87 and Shishkov

  71545/17 30/08/2017 Aleksandr Leonidovich UVAROV 1975 Shirokov Oleg Valeryevich Nizhniy Tagil IVS Krasnoturyinsk, Sverdlovsk Region; PFRSI IK-349/54 Sverdlovsk Region; IZ-66/1 Yekaterinburg; IZ-

Russia 10/12/1988 Tajikistan   App. no. 81344/17 27/11/2017   Timofey Shirokov Detention pending extradition   15 April 2016 – arrested and subsequently detained 12 October 2017 - released

    The Court notes that the complaint is similar to those in previous cases against Bulgaria where violations were found (see, for example, Ilijkov , cited above, §§ 67-87, and Shishkov v.

) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500     59663/18 06/12/2018 Igor Vladimirovich SHARKOV

proceedings conducted under Article   5 § 4 of the Convention should meet, to the largest extent possible under the circumstances of an ongoing investigation, the basic requirements of a fair trial ( Shishkov

according to its case-law, Article 5 § 4 enshrines, as does Article 6 § 1, the right of access to a court, which can only be subject to reasonable limitations that do not impair its very essence (see Shishkov

De plus, ce jugement a été exécuté par les autorités nationales compétentes et les intéressés se sont vu administrer des soins médicaux réguliers dès leur internement (voir, par exemple, Shopov c.

La Cour a suivi une approche similaire dans des affaires qui ne concernaient pas des agents d’ é tat ( Dimitar Shopov c. Bulgarie , n o 17253/07, § 29, 16 avril 2013). 32.

potable water, overcrowding   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport   57394/19* 25/10/2019 Aleksey Sergeyevich SHILOV

Russie , no36461/05, §§   54 ‑ 57, 15 janvier 2015, et Shishkov c.

Bulgarie [GC], n o   31195/96, §§ 49-53, CEDH 1999 ‑ II   ; Shishkov c. Bulgarie , n o   38822/97, §§ 52-54, 9 janvier 2003). 56.

Bulgarie [GC], n o 31195/96, §§ 49-53, CEDH 1999 ‑ II   ; Shishkov c. Bulgarie , n o   38822/97, §§ 52-54, 9 janvier 2003). 57.

Bulgarie ([GC], n o   31195/96, CEDH 1999-II) et Shishkov c. Bulgarie (n o   38822/97, 9   janvier 2003). 86.

officer[s] authorised by law to exercise judicial power” within the meaning of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see Assenov and Others , cited above, §§ 144-50; Nikolova , cited above, §§ 49-53, and Shishkov

previously held that paragraph 4 of Article 5 of the Convention enshrines a procedural safeguard against the detention, which albeit initially lawfully ordered, later becomes unlawful and unjustified (see Shishkov