Italy , no. 58858/00, 8 December 2005; Rivera and di Bonaventura v.   Italy , no.   63869/00, 14 June 2011; and De Caterina and Others v. Italy , no. 65278/01, 28 June 2011)?

page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 21 March 2022   SECOND SECTION Application no. 2697/15 Maria

font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 27 August 2020 Published on 14 September 2020   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 71507/16 Hermanus Maria

They had been living there with four children: Yelena, Mikhail, Dmitriy and Maria.

the above application lodged on 9 August 2005, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Ms Maria

L'instance opposant Mme Maria-Isabelle X... à Me B...

bacino delle province di Caserta e di Napoli ) and the Telesina Valley Land Reclamation Consortium (Consorzio di bonifica della Valle Telesina ) (see appended table).

  Their names are as follows: Mr Leonidas Paskhalidis, Mrs Hariklia Mitakosta, Mrs Martha Agalianou, Mrs Maria Iliadi, Mrs Styliani Vitsara, Mr Markos Voudris, Mr Nikolaos Noussis, Mrs Vassiliki Galitsi

Section 7 of the 2001 Act did not contain substantive rules regarding determination of those claims and did not specify the authority competent to grant indemnity.

application out of the list of cases and the applicants’ reply to that declaration, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicants, Mr Romulus George de Pratto and Ms Ana Maria

    Decides to revise the judgment in so far as it relates to the applicant Maria   Nicolau;   2.

A revolver was found on the floor beside the body of Maria F., the applicant's aunt, and a scribbled message on her bedside table.

  The remaining seven applicants are: Iulius Moldovan, Melenuţa Moldovan, Maria Moldovan, Otilia Rostaş, Petru (Gruia) Lăcătuş , Maria Floarea Zoltan and Petru (Dîgăla) Lăcătuş.

    Did the applicants have effective access to the case file regarding the investigation of the circumstances of their relative’s death (see Oleksiy Mykhaylovych Zakharkin v.

  1, 3, 4, 7, 10, 16 and 19 did not appeal to the Constitutional Court.

    Certain applicants disagreed, while the others did not provide specific arguments. 8.

The applicant did not reply. THE LAW The Court recalls Article   37 of the Convention which, in the relevant part, reads as follows: “1.

        Il était représenté devant la Commission par Me Mateus Andrade Dias, avocat à Lisbonne.

Henryka SZYPROWSKA against Poland lodged on 28 October 2016 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Ms Maria Henryka Szyprowska, is a Polish national, who was born in 1945 and lives in Bełchatów.