CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

13 830 résultats pour « Guilly »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-138912

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2013

4 novembre 2013

He partly admitted guilt in infliction of minor bodily injuries on Mr L.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909DEC003639597

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 1998

9 septembre 1998

  Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law."     a.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12359

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2019

14 mars 2019

Latvia - 35726/10 Judgment 14.3.2019 [Section V] Article 6 Article 6-2 Presumption of innocence Finding of guilt for repeat offence while appeal against original offence still pending: violation Facts

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-944

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2010

25 mai 2010

Section III] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Order of examination of grounds of appeal: inadmissible   Facts – In December 2000 the Audiencia Provincial found the applicants guilty

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4820

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2003

12 juin 2003

The applicant, who was legally represented, was found guilty but the court gave him a discharge.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409DEC002773995

Admin. suprême

9 avril 1997

9 avril 1997

The applicant finally pleaded not guilty in respect of parts 16 and 19 but pleaded guilty to attempted burglary.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0704DEC003060596

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 1997

4 juillet 1997

of having committed an offence before that guilt is established by a court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1209JUD000542204

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2008

9 décembre 2008

before his guilt has been proved according to law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1016DEC000680903

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2007

16 octobre 2007

The applicant complained that the prosecutor should not have made a statement as to his guilt before a final judgment had been delivered by a court. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0828DEC003938998

Admin. suprême

28 août 2001

28 août 2001

Failure to mention such facts at the time cannot on its own prove guilt. But depending on the circumstances, you may hold that failure against him when deciding whether he is guilty.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0903DEC007520116

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2019

3 septembre 2019

(head of the conspiracy) and nine other people (some of whom had been found guilty of drug trafficking in the same proceedings, on the basis that they had carried out five import operations of cocaine

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0518DEC002551394

Admin. suprême

18 mai 1995

18 mai 1995

to law, the supporting reasoning of a judicial decision concerning compensation in substance amounts to a determination of the accused's guilt (Eur.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1014JUD004477316

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2021

14 octobre 2021

This may be so even in the absence of any formal finding; it suffices that there is some reasoning suggesting that the court regards the accused as guilty. ...” 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0423JUD002288593

Admin. suprême

23 avril 1998

23 avril 1998

    Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.” 32.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0301JUD003081003

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2007

1 mars 2007

before he has been proved guilty according to law (see Deweer v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0111JUD002495294

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2001

11 janvier 2001

That court assumed that the applicant was guilty, and proceeded to pull the presumption of innocence inside out.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0716REP001048683

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 1987

16 juillet 1987

  After approximately 130 court sessions the City Court gave judgment in the case on 1 November 1982, finding the applicant guilty on all counts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0506DEC000361319

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2025

6 mai 2025

Everyone shall be presumed innocent until his or her guilt has been established in accordance with the law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-158671

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2015

21 octobre 2015

– either a not guilty or a guilty verdict form. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC004218698

Admin. suprême

24 août 1999

24 août 1999

He pleaded not guilty to all five charges, and gave evidence at the trial.

Source officielle

Page 15 sur 692

← PrécédentSuivant →