and registered on 2 September 1985 under file N° 11732/85;   Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 40 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission;   Having deliberated;   Decides

Edward Fitzgerald, Barrister-at-law, of counsel.   In 1969 the applicant was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of a jeweller in the course of an armed robbery.

    In deciding whether the administrative proceedings against the applicant were fair, the Court will examine them as a whole (see Edwards v.

the above application lodged on 15 March 2010, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides

the applicant’s predecessor’s action for acceleration of the administrative proceedings, on 10 April 2012 the Zilina Regional Court found that the Land Office had been inactive and compelled it to decide

  The Court therefore found that the failure of the courts to decide the applicant’s appeal had violated his right to a hearing by a tribunal.

The applicant concluded that she had thus been denied a fair hearing, in breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 35.

It appears that the Civil Appeals Office informed him that the Court of Appeal would decide whether or not it would grant leave to appeal or a stay before 24 September 1997.

In the course of the additional inquiry which led to the refusal, K. was identified and questioned, yet he denied his alleged participation in the investigation and the applicant’s beatings. 25.

He denied having been shackled on 7   August 2014 and argued that there is no such practice as using ankle cuffs on detainees in Moldova. 43.

In the course of the proceedings the following relevant events occurred: The applicant admitted the firearms offences, but denied the other charges.

In that case the court decides on the request on the basis of the criteria contained in Section 315 CCP (para. 57 above).   61.

    In January 2003 the Yevpatoriya Prosecutor questioned police officer R. and the investigator dealing with the applicant's own criminal case, who denied the alleged ill-treatment. 20.

observations submitted by the respondent Government on 7   October 1997 and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant on 23 February 1998;     Having deliberated;     Decides

    The investigator based his findings on the forensic medical report of 24   April 2004, and the testimony provided by three police officers, who denied the applicant's allegations and

In his statement to the police, in which he was assisted by counsel, the applicant denied the accusations.

judges, and Søren Nielsen, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 6 May 2008, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government, Having deliberated, decides

    The applicant complained, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, that he had been denied a fair hearing on account of the presence of a military judge on the bench of the Izmir State Security

The United Kingdom authorities have neither confirmed nor denied the existence of an operation codenamed TEMPORA. 12.