Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la cour, composée de : Monsieur Olivier BEAUDIER, Président M.

Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la cour, composée de : Monsieur Olivier BEAUDIER, Président M.

Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la cour, composée de : Monsieur Olivier BEAUDIER, Président M.

Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la cour, composée de : Monsieur Olivier BEAUDIER, Président M.

  In the case of Alexandru-Radu Luca v.

2013 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

against Georgia and Umar Yestateyevich BAGAYEV against Georgia   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 20   November 2018 as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre

The relevant part of that judgment reads as follows: “In the response to the action the respondent denied the claim because the property in question had been [in] social ownership and because, pursuant

JUGEMENT DU 19 MAI 2026 N° Minute : 26/ N° RG 25/00643 - N° Portalis DBYG-W-B7J-DMGR Plaidoirie le 10 Mars 2026 Composition du tribunal : Président : Mme Jeanne-Odile ALMODOVAR-BOY Greffier : Mme Alexandra

The applicant parish became thus legitimate according to the applicable laws.

applications nos. 45381/15 and 8082/17, the Government raised a preliminary objection concerning the loss of victim status by the applicants for the periods of detention specified in the appended table because

It has not been shown that the spouses enjoyed different rights and/or responsibilities because of the second applicant’s citizenship.

Mr Dakayev could not be questioned because he had died.

He also provided evidence to that effect because his telephone had the ability to record times and dates of calls.

COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Mme Isabelle Defarge, présidente de chambre Mme Alexandra Berger, conseillère Mme Marie-Pierre Fournier, magistrate à titre honoraire GREFFIERE : Mme

  The Court found in its principal judgment in the case (on 13 July 2006) that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) because the applicants received no

It further held that it would adjourn for one year from the date on which the judgment became final the proceedings in all cases concerning social housing.

The applicant argued in his submissions, inter alia , that such an order was not allowed because the prosecutor had failed to comply with the provisions of Article   186 § 6 of the Code of Criminal

160.45pt; display:inline-block } .sA3D40E95 { width:52.56pt; display:inline-block } .sA8847899 { width:93.07pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 63963/19 Alexandru