CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0625JUD004957011
25 juin 2013
The material case concerns a substantial punitive tax which also applies to payments which are received, by virtue of law and within the limits of the proper exercise of rights, upon the termination of
Page 14 sur 15
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0113JUD000274621
13 janvier 2026
Of this amount, 15,000 EUR was awarded as compensation for moral damage, while the remaining 25,000 EUR was awarded by way of punitive damages, which were imposed to discourage and deter.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1018JUD004641099
18 octobre 2006
In particular, not being able to see his children was making him depressed. Treatment had begun in March 1998 and was continuing, though some improvement had been noted. 29.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD007331601
26 juillet 2005
make slavery and trafficking in human beings, and also forced marriage, offences in their criminal codes; ii.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0421DEC002570194
21 avril 1998
Greek passports: - A declaration must be submitted to the Registrar of Births, Marriages
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD003156613
17 janvier 2017
the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Portuguese nationals, Mr José Manuel Tavares de Almeida Fernandes (“the first applicant”) and Mrs Maria
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215JUD001999702
15 février 2007
Marian Boldea (« le requérant »), a saisi la Cour le 9 mai 2002 en vertu de l'article 34 de la Convention de sauvegarde des Droits de l'Homme et des Libertés fondamentales (« la Convention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1209DEC001908591
9 décembre 1992
The third applicant is married with a young family.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD001343107
26 novembre 2013
Ses héritiers, M me Maria Francesca Quattrone et M. Giuseppe Fabrizio Quattrone, nés respectivement en 1969 et 1979, ont informé la Cour qu’ils souhaitaient poursuivre la procédure.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD000226010
10 juillet 2014
He obtained a ten-year residence permit and in April 2007 the OFPRA issued him with a marriage certificate and a family record book ( livret de famille ), serving as civil-status documents. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1010JUD003703121
10 octobre 2023
On 4 April 2017 A.Z. informed the Latvian courts that on 13 January 2017 she had married H.V. and that they and A.E.Z. were living in Estonia. 17 .
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0222REP002209593
22 février 1995
She had difficulty with relationships and her two marriages only lasted brief periods. 21. The applicant instituted proceedings to claim damages from her father on 14 August 1992.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0701REP002610995
1 juillet 1998
By decree nisi of 10 May 1976, made absolute on 5 July 1976, the marriage concluded on 23 April 1962 between the applicant and Mrs D.-V. S.C. was dissolved. 18.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0225DEC002226622
25 février 2025
European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 25 February 2025 as a Chamber composed of: Jolien Schukking , President , Lado Chanturia, Faris Vehabović, Ana Maria
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD004358709
24 juillet 2012
Hence, the fine in the amount of PLN 700 was justified, as being capable of having both a dissuasive and a punitive effect on the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1006JUD004146217
6 octobre 2020
Serghides, Alena Poláčková, María Elósegui, Gilberto Felici, Erik Wennerström, Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Milan Blaško, Section Registrar, Having regard to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0705DEC006991701
5 juillet 2007
Its nature was not punitive but compensatory and it was therefore not to be considered as a penalty.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113200
27 août 2012
woman and that married women are much less likely to be the target of honour killings than single women.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1003JUD001741216
3 octobre 2023
In the case of Vasile Sorin Marin v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0615JUD002819915
15 juin 2017
On the first issue the jury found that the newspaper had alleged an extra-marital affair between the plaintiff and Mr C.