that they are operating effectively.

He contended that there had been no approval to a delay of more than one month of the impugned proceedings.

However, he recognised that there was cause to criticise his documentation of contact with patients.

, muay thaï et disciplines associées et non compris dans les dépens.

been held there for more than six months.

It is necessary that there be reason to suspect that an offence has been committed for which the most severe penalty provided is imprisonment for more than six months.

The application was introduced on 27 February 2015, that is to say, less than six months later. It follows that this objection must be dismissed. Non-exhaustion 20.

    At the same time, the applicants claimed that they had suffered significant pecuniary damage since they had been forced to operate at a loss for more than a year because the wholesale price

It is incumbent on the Government claiming non-exhaustion to satisfy the Court that the remedy was an effective one available in theory and in practice at the relevant time, that is to say, that it was

However, they said that there had been nothing to stop the applicant raising his arguments under Article 10 of the Convention in the Vagos Criminal Court, which would then have had the possibility of reaching

There was significant uncertainty as to the availability of the principal remedy they proposed, namely an action for damages for breach of the constitutional right to reasonable expedition.

    The Government submitted that there had been no deprivation of property.

That required establishing, firstly, whether the civil-law remedy had been effective in theory and in practice and, secondly, whether it would have pursued essentially the same objective as the criminal-law

In this connection, the applicants pointed out that it was true that in theory holders of a specially protected tenancy could be moved to a substitute dwelling if the dwelling they were occupying was too

Finally, it noted that the relevant legislation did not provide for a possibility to subject the respondent to a DNA test against his will and held that there was no evidence that would have justified

Moreover, the fact that the option was presented to him at all meant that his [CO] considered him to be guilty as charged and, further, that he warranted more than a minor punishment.

The step has produced good results as the average number of judgments reserved for more than 6 and 9 months has dropped by 50%, and that of interim decisions reserved for more than 2 months has dropped

ineffective in the particular circumstances of the case, or that there existed special circumstances absolving him or her of that requirement (see Dankevich v.

circumstances of the case, or that there existed special circumstances absolving him or her from this requirement.