CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

9 681 résultats pour « Steve MATE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0117DEC002862595

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 1997

17 janvier 1997

  She      is not growing up devoid of male influence for Mr. S does appear      to be a satisfactory step-parent.

Source officielle

Page 14 sur 485

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0330DEC000064806

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2010

30 mars 2010

I just cannot, and it is a matter for the Legislature, but it is a matter perhaps that the Legislature ought to be invited to give their attention to.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1018DEC004118702

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2005

18 octobre 2005

This, in the applicant’s argument, made these measures meaningless and they did not bring about any progress in the case.

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 6 - Chambre 9

5fdbb65f770b1c95781abf6d

Appel

6 février 2019

6 février 2019

Portalis 35L7-V-B7A-B2IYD Décision déférée à la Cour : jugement rendu le 05 Décembre 2016 par le Conseil de Prud'hommes - Formation paritaire d'EVRY RG n° 16/274 APPELANTES Société de fait (SDF) STEF

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425JUD006146712

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2017

25 avril 2017

With regard to meals, reference is made to the observations and recommendations set out in paragraphs 62 and 64 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0922JUD000079607

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2020

22 septembre 2020

    The prosecutor’s office carried out a pre-investigation inquiry into the matter.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1820815-1910281

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2006

26 octobre 2006

Finding that the applicants had therefore not made sufficient effort to overcome their material difficulties and find a home for their family, the District Court ruled that they were not in a position

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD000458709

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2018

24 avril 2018

The decision to recognise an individual as a victim could be made by an examiner, an investigator, a prosecutor or a court. 22 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0522JUD002449094

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2001

22 mai 2001

Captain Ertuğrul on his own account made no investigation and discussed the matter with no-one as he stated that he knew that they were not in custody. 33.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0329DEC005446208

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2011

29 mars 2011

The court ordered the City Government to re-examine the matter and make a new decision. On 6 March 1998 the City Government quashed its decision of 29 August 1997.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7028

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2000

27 juin 2000

The public prosecutor chose however not to make any enquiry as to the circumstances in which those injuries were caused.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0611DEC004029616

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2019

11 juin 2019

He is an intersex person, who was registered as male at birth, but identifies as female. In the application form he indicated his gender as male.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1697

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2009

15 janvier 2009

The men refused to produce proper identification and so were taken with the applicant's husband and his fellow captive to the local department of the interior office (“ROVD”), where enquiries were made

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4420

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2004

8 avril 2004

Similarly, no steps had been taken to verify certain statements by the victim’s wife or to obtain a video recording of the television broadcast where the family members had allegedly seen the victim.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3352

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2006

11 avril 2006

After two inquiries, the public prosecutor notified him that he had officially requested the Ministry of the Interior to make additional inquiries.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4322

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2004

15 juin 2004

The child’s best interest as well as that of the community would have required the applicant to be tried in a specialist tribunal, which would have been able to give full consideration and make proper

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7637

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 2013

16 juillet 2013

As regards the second applicant, it noted that during the first set of civil proceedings he had failed to make claims regarding the publication of the impugned article on the Internet.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13983

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2023

19 janvier 2023

breach of copyright by making available applicant’s book for payable online download without consent and no civil remedy: violation Facts – The applicant is the author of a book, a copy of which was made

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD002402907

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

(a) A formal caution is nonetheless a serious matter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0228DEC005472500

Admin. suprême

28 février 2002

28 février 2002

On 6 December 1996 the High Court made an order of mandamus against the Council requiring it to repair the road.

Source officielle