Fernandes da Silva,   Advisers.   The Court heard addresses by Ms da Graça Carvalho, Ms Pereira de Sousa and Dr Pires Preto and their replies to the questions of the judges. THE FACTS I.

, obliged them to spend several days in anxiety and fear, restricted their physical liberty and damaged their properties.

    On the same day the Ferrara public prosecutor registered the complaint and started an investigation against persons unknown ( contro   ignoti ). 5.

Il ne se peut tirer aucune conséquence non plus que la société Kering n'ait pas validé le travail préparatoire de l'appelante pour constituer une base dite "DAM" (Digital Asset Management), l'appelante

In support of her claims she submitted a time-sheet and a table for costs and expenses. 38.

On the same day, the Minister informed the applicant that the COA had been advised to prolong until 8 January 2004 the provision of facilities.

In fact, he filed an appeal against his detention on the very next day, 30 December 1999. 55.

He added that he did not know anyone who dealt with explosives, was a danger to society or was planning terrorist activities.

The applicant was detained on the same day. 19.

and kicked on the floor not proved “beyond reasonable doubt” • Failings in investigation not allowing Court to draw any inferences in that regard • Use of force by prison guards, in view of imminent danger

He noted that in 2014 he had stayed in the hospital for 144 days – whereas the average treatment period lasted twenty-one days – and his stay had come to an end only after the Ombudsperson had intervened

The three items were as follows: (a)     A pro-forma information sheet attached to the E-Fit image of one of the men Ms A said she had seen.

She accused him of having assaulted and beaten her with an electric cable the previous day.

They sought payment of compensation corresponding to NLG 250 for each day spent in detention, less the compensation amount awarded by the Court.

    The applicants remained on the ships for a few days.

protokole z kontroli przeprowadzonej przez wspomnianych na wstępie panów ), because it accused Mr W.R. of falsifying the audit report; (iii) “I wonder what was the opinion of Mr W.R. on the annual balance sheet

    A few days after their arrests, on 10 March, 12 March, 15 April, 17   May, 24 April, 23 June and 19 May 2011 respectively, the Orestiada Chief of Police ordered the applicants’  

He identified the other man that the police had seen at the West London flat that day as Mr Mohammed and was asked whether Mr Mohammed had control of any materials likely to cause danger.

Accordingly, the decision of 13 October 2014 became final on the same day. 20.