Tribunal Judiciaire RODEZ, assistée de Eliane MAIURANO, greffier, siégeant dans la salle dédiée du Centre Hospitalier de SAINTE MARIE [F] [A] né le 27 mars 2000 à [Localité 3] ayant pour avocat Maître Maé

Féral ; - et les conclusions de Mme Mathé, rapporteure publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

en biscuit gravée de fines stries concentriques, avec un espacement minimal entre elles et un relief marqué ; un bassin lisse et brillant ou émaillé ; un effet de contraste entre un pourtour mat et strié

: M. le Procureur de la République près le Tribunal Judiciaire de Pontoise [Adresse 1] à l'encontre de : SAS PPL [Adresse 2] RCS/RM PONTOISE : 933386179 - 2024 B 5776 Représentant légal : David MATA

Struck out of the list (Article 37-1 - Striking out applications;Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved)

the above, the parties AGREE (i)     that Mr Jean Michel Rascagneres, acting on behalf and as representative of Mr   Joan Millan i Tornes, considers that the case forming the subject-matter

In his view, the “matter” before the Court had not been resolved, since it encompassed not only the question whether his potential future removal to Libya would violate Article 3.

As the risk of ill-treatment contrary to Article   3 of the Convention alleged by the applicant had been removed by the domestic authorities’ decision, the matter was considered resolved within the

Law – Article 37 § 1: Considering that the applicant had been granted a permanent residence permit in Sweden and that she did not intend to pursue her application, the matter could be regarded as resolved

In his notice of appeal he submitted that he had expressed his opinions in the context of an open debate on matters of public concern.

She stated that she had obtained what she was seeking when she applied to the Court and that, for her, the matter had finally been resolved. 29.

Struck out of the list (Article 37-1 - Striking out applications;Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved)

It held that the arguments relied on by the applicant, even supposing that they were admissible, were in any event manifestly unfounded since the assessment of extreme urgency was a matter solely for the

Struck out of the list (Article 37-1 - Striking out applications;Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved)

Struck out of the list (Article 37-1 - Striking out applications;Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved)

Struck out of the list (Article 37-1 - Striking out applications;Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved)

Zacharias Sundström and Mr Matti Kauppi, lawyers practising in Helsinki. A.

venant aux lieu et place de la Compagnie d'assurances et de réassurances Rhône-Méditerranée, dont le siège est ... de Suffren, 13001 Marseille, 4 / la compagnie Assurances générales de France (AGF-MAT