Royaume-Uni , 28 mai 1985, § 57, série A n o 93, et Markovic et autres c.   Italie [GC], n o 1398/03, §§ 98-99, CEDH 2006-XIV, par exemple). 53.

  Bulgarie   [GC], n o   36760/06, §   230, CEDH   2012, et Markovic et autres c.

  Bulgarie   [GC], n o   36760/06, §   230, CEDH   2012, et Markovic et autres c.

  Russia 30/09/2022 Zhanna Antonovna SHLOSBERG 1966 Pskov Lev Markovich SHLOSBERG 1963 Pskov                  49304/22 Litke v

As for the applicant’s argument that he had been deprived of access to a court, with no alternative remedy, the Supreme Court noted, with reference to Markovic and Others v.

Nor is there anything in Markovic v Italy or in Lord Rodger’s opinion in Al-Skeini to support a ‘jurisdictional link’ as a free-standing basis for jurisdiction under article 1. 308.

This also applies where domestic law refers to rules of general international law or international agreements ( see Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no.

Rather, apart from ascertaining whether the effects of the interpretation of domestic law by the domestic courts are compatible with the Convention (see, among others, Markovic and Others v.

text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }     THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 42140/05 Vasiliy Markovich

    Application no. 11823/12 lodged on 24 February 2012 by Anatoly Markovich ZAK who was born on 25 June 1973 and lived before his arrest in Perm.

light of the domestic legal principles” of the law on social housing, and that the applicant “cannot argue that [he was] deprived of any right to a determination of the merits” of his claims (see Markovic

  Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, §   23, ECHR 2000-X, and Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, §   93, ECHR 2006 ‑ ...). Lastly, the right must be a “civil” right.

between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (for recapitulation of the relevant case-law see, for example, Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom , 28 May 1985, § 57, Series A no. 93, and Markovic

  33804/96, § 23, ECHR 2000-X, and Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, § 93, ECHR 2006 ‑ ...). Lastly, the right must be a “civil” right.

against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Russian national, Mr Genri Markovich

administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 03/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO 5,000   35195/21 18/06/2021 Ilya Markovich

of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 03/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO   35195/21* 18/06/2021 Ilya Markovich

(1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. 3,500   28965/19 06/05/2019 Vadim Markovich

Indeed, the case was litigated with vigour before two judicial instances (see Markovic and Others v.   Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, § 105, ECHR 2006 ‑ XIV). 60.